Healing ligaments have decreased cyclic modulus compared to normal ligaments and immobilization further compromises healing ligament response to cyclic loading
Authors:
- G. M. ThorntonGTG. M. Thornton
- N. G. ShriveNSN. G. Shrive
- C. B. FrankCFC. B. Frank
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 21 (4) , 716-722
Abstract
Ligaments help maintain joint stability by resisting excessive strain during the repetitive loading experienced during daily activity. Healing ligaments may be less able to fulfill this role, straining more under equivalent loading than normal ligaments. We examined the cyclic stress‐strain response of normal and healing ligaments to repetitive low loads (n = 23) or bilateral (right and left MCLs; n = 17) fashion with immobilization of the right hindlimb in the bilateral group. These MCL scars were allowed to heal for 3, 6, and 14 weeks and were cyclic creep tested at 2.2, 4.1, and 7.1 MPa, respectively. Creep test stresses were a constant 30% of the failure strength of non‐immobilized scars at the different healing intervals. Normal MCLs were creep tested at 4.1 and 7.1 MPa (n = 13). The cyclic modulus of the non‐immobilized scars was less than that of normal ligaments. The percent increase in modulus during cycling was greater for scars than for normal ligaments, likely related to increased viscous dissipation or material inferiorities in scars. Furthermore, immobilization significantly decreased the ability of scars to resist strain, with a majority of immobilized scars failing during repetitive loading. Such failures were preceded by a reduction in cyclic modulus indicating damage to the healing ligaments that was predictive of eventual total failure. The implications of this study are that joints with healing ligaments may have increased strain in joint structures while they are under stress, potentially leading to joint instability. Although immobilization could be used temporarily to maintain joint stability, remobilization would likely lead to total failure of the healing ligament. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ligament creep recruits fibres at low stresses and can lead to modulus‐reducing fibre damage at higher creep stresses: a study in rabbit medial collateral ligament modelJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2002
- Early medial collateral ligament scars have inferior creep behaviourJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2000
- Immobilization increases the vulnerability of rabbit medial collateral ligament autografts to creepJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1998
- Subfailure injury of the rabbit anterior cruciate ligamentJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1996
- In vivo forces in the anterior cruciate ligament: Direct measurements during walking and trotting in a quadrupedJournal of Biomechanics, 1994
- The early effects of joint immobilization on medial collateral ligament healing in an ACL‐deficient knee: A gross anatomic and biomechanical investigation in the adult rabbit modelJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1992
- A quantitative analysis of matrix alignment in ligament scars: A comparison of movement versus immobilization in an immature rabbit modelJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991
- The effects of initial end contact on medial collateral ligament healing: A morphological and biomechanical study in a rabbit modelJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991
- Effects of Surgical Treatment and Immobilization on the Healing of the Medial Collateral Ligament: A Long-Term Multidisciplinary StudyConnective Tissue Research, 1990
- The Connective Tissue Response to Immobility: Biochemical Changes in Periarticular Connective Tissue of the Immobilized Rabbit KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1973