Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales
Authors:
Open Access
- 23 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 42 (6) , 1129-1139
Abstract
Summary: In landscapes influenced by anthropogenic activities, such as intensive agriculture, knowledge of the relative importance and interaction of environmental factors on the composition and function of local communities across a range of spatial scales is important for maintaining biodiversity. We analysed five arthropod taxa covering a broad range of functional aspects (wild bees, true bugs, carabid beetles, hoverflies and spiders) in 24 landscapes (4 × 4 km) across seven European countries along gradients of both land‐use intensity and landscape structure. Species–environment relationships were examined in a hierarchical design of four main sets of environmental factors (country, land‐use intensity, landscape structure, local habitat properties) that covered three spatial scales (region, landscape, local) by means of hierarchical variability partitioning using partial canonical correspondence analyses. Local community composition and the distribution of body size classes and trophic guilds were most affected by regional processes, which highly confounded landscape and local factors. After correcting for regional effects, factors at the landscape scale dominated over local habitat factors. Land‐use intensity explained most of the variability in species data, whereas landscape characteristics (especially connectivity) accounted for most of the variability in body size and trophic guilds. Synthesis and applications.Our results suggest that management effort should be focused on land‐use intensity and habitat connectivity in order to enhance diversity in agricultural landscapes. Since these factors are largely independent, specific conservation programmes may be developed with regards to socio‐economic and agri‐environmental requirements. Changes in either of these factors will enhance diversity but will also result in specific effects on local communities related to dispersal ability and the resource use of species.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial hierarchical approach in community ecology: a way beyond high context‐dependency and low predictability in local phenomenaPopulation Ecology, 2004
- How Dispersal Limitation Shapes Species–Body Size Distributions in Local CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 2004
- Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on BiodiversityAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2003
- Neutrality versus the nicheNature, 2002
- Species Diversity--Scale MattersScience, 2002
- The role of resources and natural enemies in determining the distribution of an insect herbivore populationEcological Entomology, 2001
- Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversityJournal of Biogeography, 2001
- Consequences of changing biodiversityNature, 2000
- The Spatial Population Dynamics of Insects Exploiting a Patchy Food Resource: A Model Study of Local PersistenceJournal of Applied Ecology, 1996
- Partialling out the Spatial Component of Ecological VariationEcology, 1992