Clinical characteristics and outcomes in Epstein-Barr virus positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A retrospective multicenter study
Open Access
- 14 October 2025
- journal article
- Published by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK-ULAKBIM) - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS in TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
- Vol. 55 (5) , 1113-1121
Abstract
Background/aimEpstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS), represents a rare and aggressive subtype of B-cell lymphoma, officially classified as a distinct entity in the revised 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, histopathological characteristics, and survival results of patients diagnosed with EBV+ DLBCL-NOS.Materials and methodsOur retrospective study included 92 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated at two centers between 2016 and 2024. EBV status was determined using in situ hybridization for EBER, with positivity defined as; ≥50% nuclear staining in tumor cells. ResultsAmong 92 patients, 81 (88.1%) were EBV-negative, and 11 (11.9%) were EBV-positive. The median age was 63 years. EBV-positive patients had significantly more advanced-stage disease (100% vs. 71.6%, p=0.049), higher rates of splenic involvement (72.7% vs. 38.3%, p=0.048), elevated LDH levels (median 773 U/L vs. 326 U/L, p=0.043), and a greater proportion with high-risk IPI scores (IPI≥4: 63.6% vs. 27.2%, p=0.032). No differences were observed in age, gender, bulky disease, extranodal involvement, or molecular subtype. Median PFS was 12 months in the EBV-positive group, while it was not reached in the EBV-negative group (p=0.005). EBV positivity was identified as an independent risk factor for inferior PFS (HR: 6.256, 95%CI:2.398–16.324, p<0.001) but not overall survival (OS). Patients with ECOG performance status ≥2 and bone marrow involvement also had significantly worse PFS and OS. ConclusionEBV+ DLBCL is characterized by distinct clinical features, including advanced-stage disease and poorer PFS. Variability in reported prevalence underscores the need for standardized diagnostic criteria. Further research is critical to develop tailored targeted therapeutic strategies and improve outcomes for this rare lymphoma subtype.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prognostic significance of EBV DNA load and EBER status in diagnostic specimens from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patientsHematological Oncology, 2015
- Recommendations for Initial Evaluation, Staging, and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Lugano ClassificationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Clinical outcome of Epstein–Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma of the elderly in the rituximab eraCancer Science, 2014
- EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderlyBlood, 2013
- Clinical outcome of elderly patients with Epstein–Barr virus positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with a combination of rituximab and CHOP chemotherapyAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2013
- The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applicationsBlood, 2011
- Age-Related EBV-Associated B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders Constitute a Distinct Clinicopathologic Group: A Study of 96 PatientsClinical Cancer Research, 2007
- Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarrayBlood, 2004
- Senile EBV+ B-Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2003
- Epstein–Barr Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000