COVAX and COVID‐19 Vaccine Inequity: A case study of G‐20 and African Union
Open Access
- 9 May 2024
- journal article
- perspective
- Published by Wiley in Public Health Challenges
- Vol. 3 (2) , e185
Abstract
As the world has a history of vaccine nationalism, especially during the 2009 Swine flu pandemic, the COVAX alliance, a globally collaborated mechanism, was created by World Health Organization (WHO), GAVI, and UNICEF to address the inequity of COVID‐19 vaccines. One of the primary aims of this alliance was to deliver vaccines to low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), which otherwise have less or no capacity to access vaccines from the open market. It is crucial to explore the contribution of COVAX in bridging the gap in equity, accessibility, and affordability of COVID‐19 vaccines between high‐ and low‐income countries (LICs). We selected Group 20 (G20) COVAX participants and the African Union (AU) as case studies to estimate these gaps. The bilateral purchase data shows that by December 2021, the G20 countries had vaccines more than double their population, whereas the AU could procure only about one fifth (19%) of their population. Out of 52 AU countries whose data was available, only 21 of them could strike a bilateral deal with vaccine manufacturers. Even after COVAX delivery, the share of the population that could be vaccinated in AU was just 36.8%, less than the target of WHO (40%) for December 2021. It was found that the COVAX alliance worked better than the open market competition for LMICs and LICs. The cost of vaccinating 20% of the population was 0.7% of the current health expenditure for G20 countries, whereas AU countries had to spend 5.5%. COVAX bears more cost (1%–3%) for AU countries than G20 countries (less than 1%). COVAX made COVID‐19 vaccines more affordable and accessible to these countries. However, LICs were disproportionately affected even with the COVAX Facility mechanism owing to their lack of vaccine deployment infrastructure.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A critical analysis of COVAX alliance and corresponding global health governance and policy issues: a scoping reviewBMJ Global Health, 2023
- COVID-19 vaccination in Africa: A case of unsatisfied expectation and ill-preparednessVaccine: X, 2022
- Charity or empowerment? The role of COVAX for low and middle‐income countriesDeveloping World Bioethics, 2022
- COVID-19 vaccine equity: a health systems and policy perspectiveExpert Review of Vaccines, 2021
- Achieving global equity for COVID-19 vaccines: Stronger international partnerships and greater advocacy and solidarity are neededPLOS Medicine, 2021
- COVID-19 vaccine access in Africa: Global distribution, vaccine platforms, and challenges aheadImmunity, 2021
- Global vaccine equity demands reparative justice — not charityBMJ Global Health, 2021
- Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable accessBMJ, 2021
- The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global JusticeINQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 2021
- Negotiating Equitable Access to Influenza Vaccines: Global Health Diplomacy and the Controversies Surrounding Avian Influenza H5N1 and Pandemic Influenza H1N1PLOS Medicine, 2010