Biofuel production and soil GHG emissions after land‐use change to switchgrass and giant reed in the U.S. Southeast
Open Access
- 14 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Food and Energy Security
- Vol. 7 (1)
Abstract
United States mandated the production of biofuel from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Nonetheless, the cultivation of these feedstocks may produce debates, as agricultural land is scarce and it is primarily needed for food production and grazing. Thus, it is thought that biofuel production should be placed on land with low economical value (i.e., marginal land). At the same time, depending on what land is considered marginal and therefore available for lignocellulosic crops, different greenhouse gas impacts will be generated upon land use change. Here, we attempted to estimate the biomass production and soil greenhouse gas emissions of the cultivation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in the U.S. Southeast, when converting distinct former land uses. We employed the NLCD and the SSURGO databases to select grasslands, shrublands, and marginal croplands and to then allocate switchgrass and giant reed on this land basing on biophysical parameters included in the Land Capability Classification. After calibration, the DAYCENT model was employed to simulate 15‐year cultivation of both crops in the U.S. Southeast. Florida, Georgia, Mississippi and South Carolina were the States with the highest availability of land, thus the highest potential for biofuel production. Among scenarios, the one converting poor grazing land and marginal croplands yielded the greatest benefits: converting 3.6 Mha of land, 44 Mt/year of dry biomass could be produced, storing 0.05 Mt/year of soil organic C at the same time. In this scenario, considering 80‐km supply areas, nineteen biorefineries could deliver 7,124 Ml/year of advanced ethanol across the region. When minimizing giant reed invasion risks through reallocating giant reed outside flooded areas, 4,695 Ml/year of advanced ethanol could be still delivered from thirteen biorefineries, but the scenario turned in a biogenic greenhouse gas source (3.2 Mt CO2eq/year).Keywords
Funding Information
- European Project: “Development of Improved perennial non-food biomass and bioproduct crops for water-stressed environments” (WATBIO - EU-FP7, 311929)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US MidwestNature, 2013
- Total and available soil carbon fractions under the perennial grass Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers and the bioenergy crop Arundo donax L.Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012
- Life cycle assessment of different bioenergy production systems including perennial and annual cropsBiomass and Bioenergy, 2011
- Medium-Term Effect of Perennial Energy Crops on Soil Organic Carbon StorageItalian Journal of Agronomy, 2011
- Land Availability for Biofuel ProductionEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2010
- Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in EuropeBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2010
- Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balanceBiomass and Bioenergy, 2009
- Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United StatesBiomass and Bioenergy, 2005
- Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practicesEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2005
- Enhanced soils information systems from advances in computer technologyGeoderma, 1993