Immunoprofiles of COVID-19 uniquely differentiated from other viruses: A machine learning investigation of multiplex immunoassay data
Open Access
- 5 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PNAS Nexus
- Vol. 3 (8) , pgae327
Abstract
Cytokines and chemokines are vital in maintaining a healthy state by efficiently controlling invading microbes. In addition, the dysregulation of these immune mediators can contribute to viral infection pathology. We comprehensively analyzed the profiles of host immunomodulators in response to infections with members of several virus families, particularly if the SARS-CoV-2 infection produces a unique immune profile compared with other viral infections. Multiplex microbead immunoassay results from 219 datasets with a range of viruses were curated systematically. The curated immunoassay data, obtained using Luminex technology, include 35 different viruses in 18 different viral families; this analysis also incorporated data from studies performed in 7 different cell model systems with 28 different sample types. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed with a specific focus involving many investigations (>10), which include the viral families of Coronaviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Retroviridae, Flaviviridae, and Hantaviridae. A random forest-based classification of the profiles indicates that IL1-RA, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9, C-C motif chemokine ligand 4, interferon (IFN)-λ1, IFN-γ-inducing protein 10, and interleukin (IL)-27 are the top immunomodulators among human samples. Similar approaches only between Coronaviridae (COVID-19) and Orthomyxoviridae (influenza A/B) indicated that transforming growth factor-β, IFN-λ1, IL-9, and eotaxin-1 are important features. In particular, the IFN-λ1 protein was implicated as one of the significant immunomodulators differentiating viral family infection. It is evident that Coronaviridae infection, including SARS-CoV-2, induces a unique cytokine–chemokine profile and can lead to specific immunoassays for diagnosing and prognosis of viral diseases based on host immune responses. Alternatively, we can use diagnosing and prognosing. It is also essential to note that meta-analysis-based predictions must be appropriately validated before clinical implementation.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (T32 GM 37948, R25 GM131956)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cytokine levels in patients with non-M3 myeloid leukemia are key indicators of how well the disease responds to chemotherapyClinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023
- Interferon-λ treatment accelerates SARS-CoV-2 clearance despite age-related delays in the induction of T cell immunityNature Communications, 2022
- SARS-CoV-2 co-infection with influenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, or adenovirusesThe Lancet, 2022
- Cytokine profile and disease severity in patients with COVID-19Cytokine, 2021
- Ruxolitinib in treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trialJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020
- The meteorology of cytokine storms, and the clinical usefulness of this knowledgeSeminars in Immunopathology, 2017
- Overview, Strengths, and Limitations of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses2010
- Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic resultsJournal of Experimental Criminology, 2007
- The advent of the cytokine stormImmunology & Cell Biology, 2007
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979