Applying Explainable Machine Learning Models for Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients Eligible for Neoadjuvant Treatment
Authors:
- Josip VrdoljakJVJosip Vrdoljak
- Zvonimir BobanZBZvonimir Boban
- Domjan BarićDBDomjan Barić
- Darko ŠegvićDŠDarko Šegvić
- Marko KumrićMarko Kumrić
- Manuela AvirovićMAManuela Avirović
- Melita Perić BaljaMBMelita Perić Balja
- Marija Milković PerišaMPMarija Milković Periša
- Čedna TomasovićČTČedna Tomasović
- Snježana TomićSTSnježana Tomić
- Eduard VrdoljakEVEduard Vrdoljak
- Joško BožićJoško Božić
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Due to recent changes in breast cancer treatment strategy, significantly more patients are treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Radiological methods do not precisely determine axillary lymph node status, with up to 30% of patients being misdiagnosed. Hence, supplementary methods for lymph node status assessment are needed. This study aimed to apply and evaluate machine learning models on clinicopathological data, with a focus on patients meeting NST criteria, for lymph node metastasis prediction. Methods: From the total breast cancer patient data (n = 8381), 719 patients were identified as eligible for NST. Machine learning models were applied for the NST-criteria group and the total study population. Model explainability was obtained by calculating Shapley values. Results: In the NST-criteria group, random forest achieved the highest performance (AUC: 0.793 [0.713, 0.865]), while in the total study population, XGBoost performed the best (AUC: 0.762 [0.726, 0.795]). Shapley values identified tumor size, Ki-67, and patient age as the most important predictors. Conclusion: Tree-based models achieve a good performance in assessing lymph node status. Such models can lead to more accurate disease stage prediction and consecutively better treatment selection, especially for NST patients where radiological and clinical findings are often the only way of lymph node assessment.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2013
- The value of chest CT for prediction of breast tumor size: comparison with pathology measurementWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2013
- Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer and their applicability in clinical practiceThe Breast, 2013
- Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer patients using a decision tree-based modelBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2012
- The False‐Negative Rate of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta‐AnalysisWorld Journal of Surgery, 2012
- ASCO-CAP Guidelines for Breast Predictive Factor TestingApplied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, 2011
- The Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio in Axillary Lymph Node Positive Breast CancerJournal of Breast Cancer, 2011
- Relationship Between Age and Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Women With Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Predictive factors associated with axillary lymph node metastases in T1a and T1b breast carcinomas: analysis in more than 900 patients2 2Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. C.J. Van Rijsbergen. London: Butterworths; 1979: 208 pp. Price: $32.50Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979