Physiological Changes with Periodized Resistance Training in Women Tennis Players
Authors:
- William J KraemerWKWilliam J Kraemer
- Keijo HakkinenKHKeijo Hakkinen
- N Travis Triplett-McbrideNTN Travis Triplett-Mcbride
- Andrew C FryAFAndrew C Fry
- L Perry KozirisLKL Perry Koziris
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 35 (1) , 157-168
Abstract
To compare the physiological and performance adaptations between periodized and nonperiodized resistance training in women collegiate tennis athletes. Thirty women (19 +/- 1 yr) were assigned to either a periodized resistance training group (P), nonperiodized training group (NV), or a control group (C). Assessments for body composition, anaerobic power, VO2(max), speed, agility, maximal strength, jump height, tennis-service velocity, and resting serum hormonal concentrations were performed before and after 4, 6, and 9 months of resistance training performed 2-3 d.wk (-1). Nine months of resistance training resulted in significant increases in fat-free mass; anaerobic power; grip strength; jump height; one-repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press, bench press, and shoulder press; serve, forehand, and backhand ball velocities; and resting serum insulin-like growth factor-1, testosterone, and cortisol concentrations. Percent body fat and VO2(max) decreased significantly in the P and NV groups after training. During the first 6 months, periodized resistance training elicited significantly greater increases in 1-RM leg press (9 +/- 2 vs 4.5 +/- 2%), bench press (22 +/- 5 vs 11 +/- 8%), and shoulder press (24 +/- 7 vs 18 +/- 6%) than the NV group. The absolute 1-RM leg press and shoulder press values in the P group were greater than the NV group after 9 months. Periodized resistance training also resulted in significantly greater improvements in jump height (50 +/- 9 vs 37 +/- 7%) and serve (29 +/- 5 vs 16 +/- 4%), forehand (22 +/- 3 vs 17 +/- 3%), and backhand ball velocities (36 +/- 4 vs 14 +/- 4%) as compared with nonperiodized training after 9 months. These data demonstrated that periodization of resistance training over 9 months was superior for enhancing strength and motor performance in collegiate women tennis players.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serum levels of total and free IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are increased and maintained in long-term trainingJournal of Applied Physiology, 1999
- Weight Training Increases Fat-Free Mass and Strength in Untrained Young WomenJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1998
- A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young womenEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1997
- The relationships among IGF-1, DNA content, and protein accumulation during skeletal muscle hypertrophyJournal of Applied Physiology, 1996
- Comparison of Whole and Split Weight Training Routines in Young WomenCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 1994
- Power output and peak blood lactate concentration following intermittent and continuous cycling tests of anerobic capacitySports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation, 1992
- Endogenous Anabolic Hormonal and Growth Factor Responses to Heavy Resistance Exercise in Males and FemalesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991
- Neuromuscular Adaptations and Serum Hormones in Females During Prolonged Power TrainingInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1990
- Changes in isometric force‐ and relaxation‐time, electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detrainingActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1985
- Effects of Three Resistance Training Programs on Muscular Strength And Absolute and Relative EnduranceResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1982