Robust evaluation of tissue-specific radiomic features for classifying breast tissue density grades
- 29 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Medical Imaging
- Vol. 12 (S2) , 1-17
Abstract
PurposeBreast cancer risk depends on an accurate assessment of breast density due to lesion masking. Although governed by standardized guidelines, radiologist assessment of breast density is still highly variable. Automated breast density assessment tools leverage deep learning but are limited by model robustness and interpretability.ApproachWe assessed the robustness of a feature selection methodology (RFE-SHAP) for classifying breast density grades using tissue-specific radiomic features extracted from raw central projections of digital breast tomosynthesis screenings (nI=651, nII=100). RFE-SHAP leverages traditional and explainable AI methods to identify highly predictive and influential features. A simple logistic regression (LR) classifier was used to assess classification performance, and unsupervised clustering was employed to investigate the intrinsic separability of density grade classes.ResultsLR classifiers yielded cross-validated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCs) per density grade of [A: 0.909±0.032, B: 0.858±0.027, C: 0.927±0.013, D: 0.890±0.089] and an AUC of 0.936±0.016 for classifying patients as nondense or dense. In external validation, we observed per density grade AUCs of [A: 0.880, B: 0.779, C: 0.878, D: 0.673] and nondense/dense AUC of 0.823. Unsupervised clustering highlighted the ability of these features to characterize different density grades.ConclusionsOur RFE-SHAP feature selection methodology for classifying breast tissue density generalized well to validation datasets after accounting for natural class imbalance, and the identified radiomic features properly captured the progression of density grades. Our results potentiate future research into correlating selected radiomic features with clinical descriptors of breast tissue density.Keywords
Funding Information
- Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation (2023TBBCF)
- Susan G. Komen® Breast Cancer Foundation (CCR231010477)
- Federal Training (T32-EB009384)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical PracticeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2016
- Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital MammographyJAMA Oncology, 2016
- Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast DensityJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2016
- Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortiumBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016
- Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are DataRadiology, 2016
- Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast TomosynthesisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2015
- Screening Outcomes Following Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a General-Population Screening ProgramJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014
- Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital MammographyJAMA, 2014
- Radiologist Assessment of Breast Density by BI-RADS Categories Versus Fully Automated Volumetric AssessmentAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2013
- Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality?European Journal of Epidemiology, 1998