Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Complications and Laser Extraction in Children and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Implications for Implantation and Management
- 23 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 14 (4) , 344-349
Abstract
Introduction: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are being implanted for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. Over time, ICD leads adhere to venous endothelium and endocardium. Lead removal, when necessary, often requires disruption of this fibrous tissue. Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed our experience with ICD lead extraction in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. From April 1999 through January 2002, 14 patients underwent 15 lead extraction procedures to remove 21 leads (17 ICD leads and 4 pacing or sensing leads). Seven patients had surgically corrected structural heart disease (5 transposition of the great arteries with atrial switch repair and 2 corrected tetralogy of Fallot). Mean patient age at extraction was 17.9 ± 5.7 years (range 9–32), and mean duration of lead implantation was 42.0 ± 18.9 months (range 15–75). Fourteen of 15 procedures were performed for lead fracture or failure. A laser sheath was used for 20 of 21 lead extractions. Twenty of 21 leads (95%) were completely extracted. There were three instances of blood loss requiring transfusion. There were no major complications or deaths. Conclusion: Young congenital heart disease patients with an ICD are at risk for growth‐related lead distortion. The use of a laser sheath is safe and effective for ICD lead extraction in congenital heart disease patients, despite coil adherence and altered anatomy. It may be advisable to avoid dual‐coil leads in patients with the potential for future growth. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 344‐349, April 2003)Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Preventing Sudden Cardiac Death in Children, Adolescents, and Young AdultsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Complications Due to Abandoned Noninfected Pacemaker LeadsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2001
- Inferior Vena Caval Loop of an Endocardial Pacing Lead Did Not Solve the Growth Problem in a ChildPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2001
- Inferior Vena Cava Loop of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Endocardial Lead: A Possible Solution to the Growth Problem in Pediatric ImplantationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2000
- Intravascular Extraction of Problematic or Infected Permanent Pacemaker Leads: 1994–1996Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1999
- Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial11No financial support was received for performing the procedures or collecting the data, or for data analysis.JACC, 1999
- Postmortem Analysis of Encapsulation Around Long-Term Ventricular Endocardial Pacing LeadsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1999
- Five‐Years Experience with Intravascular Lead ExtractionPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
- Sudden cardiac death and the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in pediatric patients. The Pediatric Electrophysiology Society.Circulation, 1993
- Actively Adhering Endocardial Leads for Pacing in ChildrenThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1981