Reliability and Validity of Electro-Goniometric Range of Motion Measurements in Patients with Hand and Wrist Limitations
Open Access
- 15 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in The Open Orthopaedics Journal
- Vol. 10 (1) , 190-205
Abstract
Study Design: Cross-sectional reliability and validity study. Purpose: 1. To determine intrarater, interrater and inter instrument reliabilities and validity of two digital electro goniometry to measure active wrist/finger range of motions (ROMs) in patients with limited motion. 2. To determine intrarater and interrater reliabilities of digital goniometry to measure torques of PIP passive flexion of the index finger in patients with limited motion. Methods: The study was designed in a randomized block plan on 44 patients (24 women, 20 men) with limited wrist or hand motions. Two experienced raters measured active wrist ROMs, and active and passive index PIP flexion using two digital goniometers. All measures were repeated by one rater 2-5 days after the initial measurements. The reliability measures were analyzed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and the construct validity was determined by correlation coefficients analysis between sub measures of scores; patient rated pain and function (PRWE) and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quick DASH) scores. Results: The intrarater, interrater and inter instrument reliabilities were high in most ROM measures (range 0.64-0.97) for both types of electro-goniometers. The 95% limit of agreements and Bland and Altman plots did not show progressive changes. There was a significant difference in force application between the raters when performing passive ROM measures for PIP index, but the same rater produced consistent force. Most of the NK and J-Tech ROM measures were moderately correlated with the patient rated pain and function scores (range 0.32-0.63).Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence in Altman–Bland plots: A critical review of the method of differencesClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 2010
- Accuracy and feasibility of using an electrogoniometer for measuring simple thumb movementsErgonomics, 2007
- Impact of impaired wrist motion on hand and upper-extremity performanceThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2003
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Association between objective clinical variables and patient-rated disability of the wristThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2002
- Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports MedicineSports Medicine, 1998
- Objective Measures of Joint StiffnessJournal of Hand Therapy, 1995
- Reliability of Torque Range of MotionJournal of Hand Therapy, 1993
- The Reliability of Goniometric Measurements of Active and Passive Wrist MotionsAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1990
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986