Pylorus Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy With or Without Feeding Jejunostomy—A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 6 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 50 (2) , 464-471
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. Although many centers routinely place a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) after PD, it is associated with morbidity. We conducted this study to compare the perioperative outcomes with and without FJT placement post‐PD. Methods: This was an open‐label randomized controlled trial, in which the FJT was placed in one arm and the nasojejunal tube (NJT) in the other. All patients with periampullary neoplasm who underwent pylorus resecting PD were included in this study. The primary outcome assessed was clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (CR‐DGE), and the secondary outcomes were clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR‐POPF), postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Results: Forty patients were allocated to the FJT and NJT groups, and the two groups were comparable in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and perioperative outcomes, including CR‐POPF rates. The FJT group had a significantly higher CR‐DGE rate (55% vs. 25%, p = 0.006), required increased use of prokinetic drugs (77.5% vs. 45%, p = 0.003), and had a longer median postoperative hospital stay (11 vs. 9 days, p = 0.007). Both groups had similar tube‐related complications. In the NJT group, 22.5% of the patients with CR‐DGE required parenteral nutrition. On multivariate analysis, the presence of FJT [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 6.030 (1.431–25.402), p = 0.014] and intra‐abdominal collection [aOR, 7.108 (1.026–49.224), p = 0.047] were independent risk factors for CR‐DGE. Conclusion: Post‐PD placement of FJT was an independent risk factor for CR‐DGE. Hence, the routine use of the FJT can be omitted after PD without compromising postoperative morbidity and nutrition. Trial Registration: The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Register with CTRI number: CTRI/2021/02/030942 ( https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advancesearchmain.php )Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Compliance on Outcome After Pancreatic Surgery: Results From a Certified ERAS CenterAnnals of Surgery Open, 2024
- Complications After PancreaticoduodenectomySurgical Clinics of North America, 2021
- Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enhances early postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomyHepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2019
- Enhanced recovery after surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Review of current evidence and trendsInternational Journal of Surgery, 2018
- The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years AfterSurgery, 2017
- Utility of feeding jejunostomy tubes in pancreaticoduodenectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 2017
- Feeding jejunostomy during Whipple is associated with increased morbidityJournal of Surgical Research, 2014
- Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendationsClinical Nutrition, 2012
- Recent advances in studies of spontaneous activity in smooth muscle: Ubiquitous pacemaker cellsProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2010
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004