India’s Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (6) , e67452
Abstract
India accounts for 19% of global maternal deaths, three-quarters of which come from nine states. In 2005, India launched a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), to reduce maternal mortality ratio (MMR) through promotion of institutional births. JSY is the largest CCT in the world. In the nine states with relatively lower socioeconomic levels, JSY provides a cash incentive to all women on birthing in health institution. The cash incentive is intended to reduce financial barriers to accessing institutional care for delivery. Increased institutional births are expected to reduce MMR. Thus, JSY is expected to (a) increase institutional births and (b) reduce MMR in states with high proportions of institutional births. We examine the association between (a) service uptake, i.e., institutional birth proportions and (b) health outcome, i.e., MMR. Data from Sample Registration Survey of India were analysed to describe trends in proportion of institutional births before (2005) and during (2006–2010) the implementation of the JSY. Data from Annual Health Survey (2010–2011) for all 284 districts in above- mentioned nine states were analysed to assess relationship between MMR and institutional births. Proportion of institutional births increased from a pre-programme average of 20% to 49% in 5 years (p<0.05). In bivariate analysis, proportion of institutional births had a small negative correlation with district MMR (r = −0.11).The multivariate regression model did not establish significant association between institutional birth proportions and MMR [CI: −0.10, 0.68]. Our analysis confirmed that JSY succeeded in raising institutional births significantly. However, we were unable to detect a significant association between institutional birth proportion and MMR. This indicates that high institutional birth proportions that JSY has achieved are of themselves inadequate to reduce MMR. Other factors including improved quality of care at institutions are required for intended effect.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving access to maternity services: an overview of cash transfer and voucher schemes in South AsiaReproductive Health Matters, 2012
- An investigation of maternal deaths following public protests in a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh, central IndiaReproductive Health Matters, 2012
- Addressing access barriers to health services: an analytical framework for selecting appropriate interventions in low-income Asian countriesHealth Policy and Planning, 2011
- Eradicating diseases: The effect of conditional cash transfers on vaccination coverage in rural NicaraguaJournal of Health Economics, 2009
- Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Uptake of Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesJAMA, 2007
- Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimatesPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2007
- Programme Evaluation with Unobserved Heterogeneity and Selective Implementation: The Mexican PROGRESA Impact on Child NutritionOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2005
- The evidence for emergency obstetric careInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2005
- Consumer‐led demand side financing in health and education and its relevance for low and middle income countriesThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2004
- Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA′s Control Randomized ExperimentAmerican Economic Review, 2004