Experimental Subseasonal‐to‐Seasonal (S2S) Forecasting of Atmospheric Rivers Over the Western United States
Open Access
- 13 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 124 (21) , 11242-11265
Abstract
A multimodel evaluation of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) hindcast skill of atmospheric rivers (ARs) out to 4‐week lead over the western United States is presented for three operational hindcast systems: European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF; Europe), National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP; U.S.), and Environment and Canada Climate Change (ECCC; Canada). Ensemble mean biases and Brier Skill Scores are examined for no, moderate, and high levels of AR activity (0, 1–2, and 3–7 AR days/week, respectively). All hindcast systems are more skillful in predicting no and high AR activity relative to moderate activity. There are isolated regions of skill at week‐3 over 150–125°W, 25–35°N for the no and high AR activity levels, with larger magnitude and spatial extent of the skill in ECMWF and ECCC compared to NCEP. The spatial pattern of this skill suggests that for high AR activity, a southwest‐to‐northeast orientation is more predictable at subseasonal lead times than other orientations, and for no AR activity, more skill exists in the subtropical North Pacific, upstream of central and southern California. AR hindcast skill along the western U.S. is most strongly increased in hindcasts initialized during Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) Phases 1 and 8, and hindcast skill is substantially decreased over California in hindcasts initialized during MJO Phase 4. Skill modulations in the ECMWF hindcast system conditioned on El Niño‐Southern Oscillation phase are weaker than those conditioned on particular MJO phases. This work provides hindcast skill benchmarks and uncertainty quantification for experimental real‐time forecasts of AR activity during winters 2019–2021 as part of the S2S Prediction Project Real‐time Pilot Initiative in collaboration with the California Department of Water Resources.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts With Machine LearningGeophysical Research Letters, 2019
- Skillful Subseasonal Forecasts of Weekly Tornado and Hail Activity Using the Madden‐Julian OscillationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2018
- How far in advance can we predict changes in large‐scale flow leading to severe cold conditions over Europe?Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2018
- Global evaluation of atmospheric river subseasonal prediction skillClimate Dynamics, 2018
- Global Analysis of Climate Change Projection Effects on Atmospheric RiversGeophysical Research Letters, 2018
- Global Assessment of Atmospheric River Prediction SkillJournal of Hydrometeorology, 2018
- Advancing atmospheric river forecasts into subseasonal‐to‐seasonal time scalesGeophysical Research Letters, 2017
- The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation systemQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- Atmospheric Rivers, Floods and the Water Resources of CaliforniaWater, 2011
- Toward Better Understanding of the Contiguous Rain Area (CRA) Method for Spatial Forecast VerificationWeather and Forecasting, 2009