Roadmap Towards Responsible AI in Crisis Resilience Management
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
Novel data sensing and AI technologies are finding practical use in the analysis of crisis resilience, revealing the need to consider how responsible artificial intelligence (AI) practices can mitigate harmful outcomes and protect vulnerable populations. In this paper, we present a responsible AI roadmap that is embedded in the Crisis Information Management Circle. This roadmap includes six propositions to highlight and address important challenges and considerations specifically related to responsible AI for crisis resilience management. We cover a wide spectrum of interwoven challenges and considerations pertaining to the responsible collection, analysis, sharing, and use of information such as equity, fairness, biases, explainability and transparency, accountability, privacy and security, inter-organizational coordination, and public engagement. Through examining issues around AI systems for crisis resilience management, we dissect the inherent complexities of information management and decision-making in crises and highlight the urgency of responsible AI research and practice. The ideas laid out in this paper are the first attempt in establishing a roadmap for researchers, practitioners, developers, emergency managers, humanitarian organizations, and public officials to address important considerations for responsible AI pertaining to crisis resilience management.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Interplay of Data and Cognitive Bias in Crisis Information ManagementInformation Systems Frontiers, 2022
- From warning messages to preparedness behavior: The role of risk perception and information interaction in the Covid-19 pandemicInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022
- Towards coordinated self-organization: An actor-centered framework for the design of disaster management information systemsInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020
- Spatial biases in crowdsourced data: Social media content attention concentrates on populous areas in disastersComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2020
- Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcareGovernment Information Quarterly, 2019
- The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disastersGeoJournal, 2014
- Measuring Capacities for Community ResilienceSocial Indicators Research, 2010
- Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards – the case of the UN Global CompactCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009
- Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercisesInformation Systems Frontiers, 2009
- Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future researchJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007