The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article
Authors:
- Natsuko ShintaniNSNatsuko Shintani
- Rod EllisRERod Ellis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Second Language Writing
- Vol. 22 (3) , 286-306
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CFJournal of Second Language Writing, 2012
- Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedbackJournal of Second Language Writing, 2010
- Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforwardJournal of Second Language Writing, 2009
- The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month InvestigationApplied Linguistics, 2009
- The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international studentsLanguage Teaching Research, 2008
- INTERPRETING RECASTS AS LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE: The Roles of Linguistic Target, Length, and Degree of ChangeStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 2007
- AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGEStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 2005
- The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writingJournal of Second Language Writing, 2003
- The Structural Syllabus and Second Language AcquisitionTESOL Quarterly, 1993
- THE ONE TO ONE PRINCIPLE OF INTERLANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONLanguage Learning, 1984