Differentiating Fact from Fantasy: The Reliability of Children's Memory
Authors:
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 40 (2) , 33-50
Abstract
This paper examines a set of common assumptions about children's memory. Children compared to adults are thought to notice less, omit more, forget faster, be more susceptible to suggestion, and especially to intermingle imagination and perception in remembering. These propositions are interesting from the point of view of theoretical models of memory and memory development. They also have important implications for legal practice. While children's tendency to recall less than adults is well documented, there is surprisingly little evidence for other deficits in children's memory. This paper describes a new line of research, directed at the question of whether children are worse than adults in discriminating real from imagined events in memory (reality monitoring). The results suggest that children may have difficulty with some, but not all, reality‐monitoring situations.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distortions in the Memory of ChildrenJournal of Social Issues, 1984
- Influencing eyewitness descriptions.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- Children's competency to testify.Law and Human Behavior, 1981
- The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion: An empirical study.Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- The potential of children as eyewitnesses: A comparison of children and adults on eyewitness tasks.Law and Human Behavior, 1979
- The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool childrenJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1978
- Age-Related Aspects of Comprehension and Inference from a Televised Dramatic NarrativeChild Development, 1978
- Utilization of Retrieval Cues by Children in RecallChild Development, 1974
- A developmental study of retention.Developmental Psychology, 1973
- Effects of Kind of Question and Atmosphere of Interrogation on Accuracy and Completeness of TestimonyHarvard Law Review, 1971