Beating the Random Ordering is Hard: Inapproximability of Maximum Acyclic Subgraph

Authors:
  • VGVenkatesan Guruswami
    Venkatesan Guruswami
  • RMRajsekar Manokaran
    Rajsekar Manokaran
  • PRPrasad Raghavendra
    Prasad Raghavendra
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
We prove that approximating the max. acyclic subgraph problem within a factor better than 1/2 is unique games hard. Specifically, for every constant epsiv > 0 the following holds: given a directed graph G that has an acyclic subgraph consisting of a fraction (1-epsiv) of its edges, if one can efficiently find an acyclic subgraph of G with more than (1/2 + epsiv) of its edges, then the UGC is false. Note that it is trivial to find an acyclic subgraph with 1/2 the edges, by taking either the forward or backward edges in an arbitrary ordering of the vertices of G. The existence of a rho-approximation algorithmfor rho > 1/2 has been a basic open problem for a while. Our result is the first tight inapproximability result for an ordering problem. The starting point of our reduction isa directed acyclic subgraph (DAG) in which every cut isnearly-balanced in the sense that the number of forward and backward edges crossing the cut are nearly equal; such DAGs were constructed by Charikar et al. Using this, we are able to study max. acyclic subgraph, which is a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) over an unbounded domain, by relating it to a proxy CSP over a bounded domain. The latter is then amenable to powerful techniques based on the invariance principle. Our results also give a super-constant factor inapproximability result for the feedback arc set problem. Using our reductions, we also obtain SDP integrality gapsfor both the problems.

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit: