The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Vol. 89-B (3) , 408-412
Abstract
One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polyethylene Failure of the Patellar Component in New Jersey Low-Contact Stress Total Knee ArthroplastiesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- Patella kinematics and patello-femoral contact areas in patients with genu varum and mild osteoarthritisClinical Biomechanics, 2004
- A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral jointJournal of Biomechanics, 2004
- Failure of the all-polyethylene patellar component after total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999
- Selective Patellar Nonresurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty 10 Year ResultsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999
- Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurementsOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1999
- Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- Nonresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1989
- Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1987
- The Patellofemoral Joint in Total Condylar Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1986