Implementation Experiences of a School-Based Adolescent Nutrition Education Intervention: A Post-Intervention Qualitative Study Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Social Ecological Model
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: School-based nutrition education provides a platform that could help in the promotion of healthy eating habits among adolescents. Nonetheless, information about the factors influencing the success of these interventions in low- and middle- income countries is still lacking. The objective of the study was to identify facilitators and barriers to effective implementation of school-based nutrition education by applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and interpreting findings across levels of the Social Ecological Model (SEM). Methods: A qualitative study was conducted after eight to ten weeks of nutrition education intervention in an urban school setting. Data were collected through two focus group discussions with sixteen students (eight students in each group), in-depth interviews with four teachers, six parents and key informant interviews with two school administrators. A semi-structured, CFIR- and SEM-based guide was used to conduct the data collection. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach, with deductive and inductive coding conducted independently by two researchers and reconciled through consensus. Results: Five themes were aligned with CFIR domains, including intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, character of individuals, and implementation process. In general, the stakeholders agreed to the importance of relevance and contextualization of the intervention and the use of multi-mediums (classroom-based and online) to deliver the intervention, which they perceived to support improved knowledge of nutrition among adolescents. Implementation of the programme faced challenges arising from the incongruence between messages delivered in classrooms and those served in the school canteens, economic hurdles from home, cultural practices related to food consumption, social influence on peers and media, lack of time among staff, and largely passive parent participation. Conclusions: Nutrition education was perceived as inadequate on its own to support sustainable behaviour related dietary change. Factors that may influence whether nutrition messages can be translated into practice were identified by the study participants and include the school food environment (canteen), the development of the curriculum, policy integration, and shift in parental participation from passive learning to active collaboration.Keywords
Funding Information
- Qassim University (QU-APC-2026)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adolescent Nutrition and Health: a Critical Period for Nutritional Intervention to Prevent Long Term Health ConsequencesCurrent Nutrition Reports, 2025
- Health4Life eHealth intervention to modify multiple lifestyle risk behaviours among adolescent students in Australia: a cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Digital Health, 2023
- Examining the New Zealand school food environment: what needs to change?Nutrition Research Reviews, 2022
- Prevalence of multiple non-communicable diseases risk factors among adolescents in 140 countries: A population-based studyeClinicalMedicine, 2022
- Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis.Qualitative Psychology, 2022
- Strategies and interventions for healthy adolescent growth, nutrition, and developmentThe Lancet, 2022
- Nutrition Interventions in Low-Income Rural and Urban Retail Environments: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2021
- Adherence to National Food Guide Recommendations: Can It Slow the Obesity Epidemic? A Systematic ReviewCurrent Nutrition Reports, 2020
- Determination of Nutrition and Physical Activity Status of Early Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Anatolian Side of IstanbulEcology of Food and Nutrition, 2019
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007