Extending MPAS‐NoahMP Model System Capability Beyond Weather Timescales: Evaluation of Hydroclimate and Land‐Atmosphere Interactions
Authors:
- Zhe ZhangZZZhe Zhang
- Cenlin HeCenlin He
- Judith BernerJBJudith Berner
- Abigail JayeAJAbigail Jaye
- Michael BarlageMBMichael Barlage
- Jimy DudhiaJimy Dudhia
- Kai HuangKHKai Huang
- Tzu‐Shun LinTLTzu‐Shun Lin
- Ronnie Abolafia‐RosenzweigRARonnie Abolafia‐Rosenzweig
- Julia KukuliesJKJulia Kukulies
- Megan D. FowlerMFMegan D. Fowler
- 3 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 131 (11)
Abstract
Subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) forecasts are critically important for anticipating socioeconomic impacts but remain a significant scientific challenge. Reliable forecasts beyond a 2‐week timeframe require both accurate initial conditions and realistic representations of coupled Earth system processes. In particular, the Earth's land surface provides a key source of predictability for S2S predictions through land‐atmosphere interactions. Here, we present a 25‐year global 60‐km simulation using the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) coupled to the Noah‐MP land surface model, forced with ERA‐5 sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary conditions. This study evaluates the model's climatology, systematic biases, and ability to represent land‐atmosphere interactions, all of which are critical for future S2S applications. MPAS‐NoahMP captures well the annual surface temperature in the tropics and midlatitudes, while winter temperatures in North America and Asia are sensitive to sea ice thickness and snowpack thermal properties. The global precipitation pattern is also effectively reproduced by MPAS‐NoahMP, with slight dry biases in the tropics of the Eastern Pacific, Amazon, Congo Basin, and Maritime Continent, and wet biases in the tropical Indian ocean. The model accurately simulates spatial patterns of land‐atmosphere coupling indices and hotspots, including winter snow‐temperature coupling and summer soil moisture‐latent heat flux coupling. Furthermore, MPAS‐NoahMP reasonably represents the major modes of tropical variability, including the El Nino‐Southern Oscillation and the Madden‐Julian Oscillation. This study is the first to establish a long‐term MPAS‐NoahMP reference data set for understanding model biases and assessing land‐atmosphere interactions, providing a foundation for guiding future improvements to the coupled system for S2S applications.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Center for Atmospheric Research
- National Science Foundation (1852977)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis2023
- The ERA5 global reanalysisQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2020
- Land Surface Processes Relevant to Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction2019
- A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challengesReviews of Geophysics, 2015
- The terrestrial segment of soil moisture-climate couplingGeophysical Research Letters, 2011
- The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basinsJournal of Geophysical Research, 2011
- The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurementsJournal of Geophysical Research, 2011
- Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A reviewEarth-Science Reviews, 2010
- Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008
- Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 2. Formulation, validation, and soil moisture simulationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2007