Soil-Borne Legacies of Disease in Arabidopsis thaliana
- 8 November 2020
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 2232, 209-218
Abstract
The rhizosphere microbiome of plants is essential for plant growth and health. Recent studies have shown that upon infection of leaves with a foliar pathogen, the composition of the root microbiome is altered and enriched with bacteria that in turn can systemically protect the plant against the foliar pathogen. This protective effect is extended to successive populations of plants that are grown on soil that was first conditioned by pathogen-infected plants, a phenomenon that was coined “the soil-borne legacy.” Here we provide a detailed protocol for soil-borne legacy experiments with the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana after infection with the obligate biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. This protocol can easily be extended to infection with other pathogens or even infestation with herbivorous insects and can function as a blueprint for soil-borne legacy experiments with crop species.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soil immune responsesScience, 2016
- The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiontNew Phytologist, 2015
- Induced Systemic Resistance by Beneficial MicrobesAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 2014
- The rhizosphere microbiome and plant healthTrends in Plant Science, 2012
- Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive BacteriaScience, 2011
- Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO 2Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Plant-Growth-Promoting RhizobacteriaAnnual Review of Microbiology, 2009
- Costs and trade-offs associated with induced resistancePhysiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 2007
- 13CO2 pulse labelling of plants in tandem with stable isotope probing: methodological considerations for examining microbial function in the rhizosphereJournal of Microbiological Methods, 2004
- MICROBIALPOPULATIONSRESPONSIBLE FORSPECIFICSOILSUPPRESSIVENESS TOPLANTPATHOGENSAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 2002