Socio-Spatial Segregation and the Spatial Structure of ‘Ordinary’ Activities in the Global South
Open Access
- 31 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cogitatio in Urban Planning
- Vol. 5 (3) , 303-318
Abstract
Planning practice in the Global South often defines a border between formal and informal developments ignoring the complex and nuanced reality of urban practices and, consequently, worsening segregation. This article proposes an alternative view of socio-spatial segregation that shifts the distinction between formal/informal towards one that emphasises access to opportunities and their relationship with the spatial structure of the city. Under this alternative framework, applied to the case of the Valle Amauta neighbourhood in Lima, Peru, we reflect on how socio-economic activities, shaped by spatial conditions and social practices, increase or reduce socio-spatial segregation. Our findings suggest that a shift towards strategies aimed at increasing accessibility to centrality, provided by the density of social and economic activities, could offer new opportunities for planning practice and theory in the Global South.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The multi-layered-ness of urban segregationHabitat International, 2016
- Recent changes in the patterns of socio-spatial segregation in Metropolitan LimaHabitat International, 2016
- The Last Slum: Moving from Illegal Settlements to Subsidized Home Ownership in ChileUrban Affairs Review, 2010
- Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban IssuesUrban Studies, 2009
- Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and EthicsPlanning Theory, 2006
- Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of PlanningJournal of the American Planning Association, 2005
- Segregation in Vienna: Impacts of Market Barriers and Rent RegulationsUrban Studies, 1998
- The Enclave, the Citadel, and the GhettoUrban Affairs Review, 1997
- A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should KnowJournal of Planning Literature, 1992
- STUDIES IN SEED AND SEEDLING MORTALITYNew Phytologist, 1956