Helical Plating Compared with Straight Plating and Nailing for Treatment of Proximal Third Humeral Shaft Fractures—A Biomechanical Study
Authors:
- Torsten PastorTPTorsten Pastor
- Ivan ZdericIZIvan Zderic
- Tatjana PastorTPTatjana Pastor
- Ludmil DrenchevLudmil Drenchev
- Hristo Kostov SkulevHSHristo Kostov Skulev
- Kenneth P. van KnegselKKKenneth P. van Knegsel
- Mark LenzMLMark Lenz
- Björn-Christian LinkBLBjörn-Christian Link
- Boyko GueorguievBoyko Gueorguiev
- Frank J. P. BeeresFBFrank J. P. Beeres
Open Access
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The surgical treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures usually considers application of either long straight plates or intramedullary nails. By being able to spare the rotator cuff and avoid the radial nerve distally, the implementation of helical plates might overcome the downsides of common fixation methods. The aims of the current study were (1) to explore the biomechanical competence of different plate designs and (2) to compare their performance versus the alternative treatment option of using intramedullary nails. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four artificial humeri were assigned to the following four groups for simulation of an unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture and instrumentation: Group 1 (Straight-PHILOS), Group 2 (MULTILOC-Nail), Group 3 (45°-Helical-PHILOS), and Group 4 (90°-Helical-PHILOS). All specimens underwent non-destructive, quasi-static biomechanical testing under loading in axial compression, torsion in internal/external rotation, and pure bending in four directions, accompanied by motion tracking. Results: Axial stiffness/displacement in Group 2 was significantly higher/smaller than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.010). Torsional displacement in Group 2 was significantly bigger than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.017). Significantly smaller coronal plane displacement was identified in Group 2 versus all other groups (p < 0.001) and in Group 4 versus Group 1 (p = 0.022). Significantly bigger sagittal plane displacement was detected in Group 4 versus all other groups (p ≤ 0.024) and in Group 1 versus Group 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intramedullary nails demonstrated higher axial stiffness and smaller axial interfragmentary movements compared with all investigated plate designs. However, they were associated with bigger torsional movements at the fracture site. Although 90°-helical plates revealed bigger interfragmentary movements in the sagittal plane, they demonstrated improved resistance against displacements in the coronal plane when compared with straight lateral plates. In addition, 45°-helical plates manifested similar biomechanical competence to straight plates and may be considered a valid alternative to the latter from a biomechanical standpoint.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long PHILOS plate fixation in a series of humeral fracturesEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013
- Interlocking Nails and Minimally Invasive OsteosynthesisVeterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 2012
- Minimally Invasive Helical Plating for Shaft of Humerus Fractures: Technique and OutcomeThe Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2012
- Treatment of proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures with lateral distal tibial helical plateEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2011
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Two-Part Surgical Neck Fractures of the Humerus Fixed by an Angular Stable Locked Intramedullary NailJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2011
- The Extended Deltoid-Splitting Approach to the Proximal HumerusJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2007
- Helical plating of the proximal humerusInjury, 2005
- Helical plate fixation for treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal and middle one-third of the humerusInjury, 2005
- Biomechanical testing of the LCP – how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?Injury, 2003
- Fractures of the Shaft of the Humerus in AdultsSouthern Medical Journal, 1965