Improving the quality of patient care in lung cancer: key factors for successful multidisciplinary team working
Authors:
- Alessandro MorabitoAlessandro Morabito
- Edoardo MercadanteEMEdoardo Mercadante
- Paolo MutoPMPaolo Muto
- Anna ManzoAMAnna Manzo
- Giuliano PalumboGPGiuliano Palumbo
- Vincenzo SforzaVSVincenzo Sforza
- Agnese MontaninoAMAgnese Montanino
- Claudia SandomenicoCSClaudia Sandomenico
- Raffaele CostanzoRCRaffaele Costanzo
- Giovanna EspositoGEGiovanna Esposito
- Giuseppe TotaroGTGiuseppe Totaro
- Rossella De CecioRCRossella De Cecio
Open Access
- 8 March 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Open Exploration Publishing in Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy
- Vol. 5 (2) , 260-277
Abstract
International Guidelines as well as Cancer Associations recommend a multidisciplinary approach to lung cancer care. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) can significantly improve treatment decision-making and patient coordination by putting different physicians and other health professionals “in the same room”, who collectively decide upon the best possible treatment. However, this is not a panacea for cancer treatment. The impact of multidisciplinary care (MDC) on patient outcomes is not univocal, while the effective functioning of the MDT depends on many factors. This review presents the available MDT literature with an emphasis on the key factors that characterize high-quality patient care in lung cancer. The study was conducted with a bibliographic search using different electronic databases (PubMed Central, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google) referring to multidisciplinary cancer care settings. Many key elements appear consolidated, while others emerge as prevalent and actual, especially those related to visible barriers which work across geographic, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. MDTs must be sustained by strategic management, structured within the entity, and cannot be managed as a separate care process. Furthermore, they need to coordinate with other teams (within and outside the organization) and join with the broad range of services delivered by multiple providers at various points of the cancer journey or within the system, with the vision of integrated care.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participation of inpatients in multidisciplinary team meetings: An explorative study of mental healthcare workers' perceptionArchives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2022
- Barriers and facilitators to provide multidisciplinary care for breast cancer patients in five Latin American countries: A descriptive-interpretative qualitative studyThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 2022
- Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: A narrative reviewCancer Medicine, 2022
- Perspectives on record-keeping practices in MDT meetings and meeting record utilityInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2022
- Multidisciplinary clinics for colorectal cancer may not provide more efficient coordination of careThe American Journal of Surgery, 2021
- Multidisciplinary Clinic Models: A Paradigm of Care for Management of NAFLDHepatology, 2021
- European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Lung cancerLung Cancer, 2020
- Leadership perspectives in multidisciplinary team meetings; observational assessment based on the ATLAS instrument in cancer careCancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2020
- Medical decision making for older patients during multidisciplinary oncology team meetingsJournal of Geriatric Oncology, 2019
- Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelineLung Cancer, 2006