Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learning
Authors:
- 1 October 2021
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 9365-9374
Abstract
Learning from non-stationary data streams and overcoming catastrophic forgetting still poses a serious challenge for machine learning research. Rather than aiming to improve state-of-the-art, in this work we provide insight into the limits and merits of rehearsal, one of continual learning’s most established methods. We hypothesize that models trained sequentially with rehearsal tend to stay in the same low-loss region after a task has finished, but are at risk of overfitting on its sample memory, hence harming generalization. We provide both conceptual and strong empirical evidence on three benchmarks for both behaviors, bringing novel insights into the dynamics of rehearsal and continual learning in general. Finally, we interpret important continual learning works in the light of our findings, allowing for a deeper understanding of their successes. 1Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Brain-inspired replay for continual learning with artificial neural networksNature Communications, 2020
- A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-playScience, 2018
- PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruning2018
- iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning2017
- Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition2016
- Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree searchNature, 2016
- ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition ChallengeInternational Journal of Computer Vision, 2015
- Large-Scale Machine Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent2010
- Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networksTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999
- Gradient-based learning applied to document recognitionProceedings of the IEEE, 1998