The Effect and Cost-Effectiveness of Offering a Combined Lifestyle Intervention for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Primary Care: Results of the Healthy Heart Stepped-Wedge Trial
Open Access
- 13 March 2023
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (6) , 5040
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of offering the combined lifestyle programme “Healthy Heart”, addressing overweight, diet, physical activity, smoking and alcohol, to improve lifestyle behaviour and reduce cardiovascular risk. Design: A practice-based non-randomised stepped-wedge cluster trial with two-year follow-up. Outcomes were obtained via questionnaires and routine care data. A cost–utility analysis was performed. During the intervention period, “Healthy Heart” was offered during regular cardiovascular risk management consultations in primary care in The Hague, The Netherlands. The period prior to the intervention period served as the control period. Results: In total, 511 participants (control) and 276 (intervention) with a high cardiovascular risk were included (overall mean ± SD age 65.0 ± 9.6; women: 56%). During the intervention period, 40 persons (15%) participated in the Healthy Heart programme. Adjusted outcomes did not differ between the control and intervention period after 3–6 months and 12–24 months. Intervention versus control (95% CI) 3–6 months: weight: β −0.5 (−1.08–0.05); SBP β 0.15 (−2.70–2.99); LDL-cholesterol β 0.07 (−0.22–0.35); HDL-cholesterol β −0.03 (−0.10–0.05); physical activity β 38 (−97–171); diet β 0.95 (−0.93–2.83); alcohol OR 0.81 (0.44–1.49); quit smoking OR 2.54 (0.45–14.24). Results were similar for 12–24 months. Mean QALYs and mean costs of cardiovascular care were comparable over the full study period (mean difference (95% CI) QALYs: −0.10 (−0.20; 0.002); costs: EUR 106 (−80; 293)). Conclusions: For both the shorter (3–6 months) and longer term (12–24 months), offering the Healthy Heart programme to high-cardiovascular-risk patients did not improve their lifestyle behaviour nor cardiovascular risk and was not cost-effective on a population level.Keywords
Funding Information
- ZonMw (531001203)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- National diabetes prevention program (DEHKO): awareness and self-reported lifestyle changes in Finnish middle-aged populationPublic Health, 2015
- A Guide to Handling Missing Data in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Conducted Within Randomised Controlled TrialsPharmacoEconomics, 2014
- Effectiveness of Cultural Adaptations of Interventions Aimed at Smoking Cessation, Diet, and/or Physical Activity in Ethnic Minorities. A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2013
- Economic evaluation of a lifestyle intervention in primary care to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases: a randomized controlled trialBMC Family Practice, 2013
- A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010The Lancet, 2012
- Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population – data from general practicesBMC Public Health, 2012
- Lifestyle Interventions Are Cost-Effective in People With Different Levels of Diabetes RiskDiabetes Care, 2007
- Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 2006
- Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- The ‘Utility’ of the Visual Analog Scale in Medical Decision Making and Technology Assessment: Is It an Alternative to the Time Trade-off?International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996