A Formal Verification Methodology for DDD Mode Pacemaker Control Programs
Open Access
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
- Vol. 2015, 1-10
Abstract
Pacemakers are safety-critical devices whose faulty behaviors can cause harm or even death. Often these faulty behaviors are caused due to bugs in programs used for digital control of pacemakers. We present a formal verification methodology that can be used to check the correctness of object code programs that implement the safety-critical control functions of DDD mode pacemakers. Our methodology is based on the theory of Well-Founded Equivalence Bisimulation (WEB) refinement, where both formal specifications and implementation are treated as transition systems. We develop a simple and general formal specification for DDD mode pacemakers. We also develop correctness proof obligations that can be applied to validate object code programs used for pacemaker control. Using our methodology, we were able to verify a control program with millions of transitions against the simple specification with only 10 transitions. Our method also found several bugs during the verification process.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closed-loop verification of medical devices with model abstraction and refinementInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2013
- Modeling and Verification of a Dual Chamber Implantable Pacemaker2012
- Satisfiability modulo theoriesCommunications of the ACM, 2011
- Cyber–Physical Modeling of Implantable Cardiac Medical DevicesProceedings of the IEEE, 2011
- Cardiac Pacemakers and Resynchronization Step‐by‐Step2010
- High-Confidence Medical Device Software and SystemsComputer, 2006
- A Formal Methods Approach to Medical Device ReviewComputer, 2006
- Recalls and Safety Alerts Involving Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator GeneratorsJAMA, 2001
- Uppaal in a nutshellInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1997
- Formal methodsACM Computing Surveys, 1996