The future of spine surgery: New horizons in the treatment of spinal disorders
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Scientific Scholar in Surgical Neurology International
- Vol. 4 (2) , S15-21
Abstract
As with any evolving surgical discipline, it is difficult to predict the future of the practice and science of spine surgery. In the last decade, there have been dramatic developments in both the techniques as well as the tools employed in the delivery of better outcomes to patients undergoing such surgery. In this article, we explore four specific areas in spine surgery: namely the role of minimally invasive spine surgery; motion preservation; robotic-aided surgery and neuro-navigation; and the use of biological substances to reduce the number of traditional and revision spine surgeries. Minimally invasive spine surgery has flourished in the last decade with an increasing amount of surgeries being performed for a wide variety of degenerative, traumatic, and neoplastic processes. Particular progress in the development of a direct lateral approach as well as improvement of tubular retractors has been achieved. Improvements in motion preservation techniques have led to a significant number of patients achieving arthroplasty where fusion was the only option previously. Important caveats to the indications for arthroplasty are discussed. Both robotics and neuro-navigation have become further refined as tools to assist in spine surgery and have been demonstrated to increase accuracy in spinal instrumentation placement. There has much debate and refinement in the use of biologically active agents to aid and augment function in spine surgery. Biological agents targeted to the intervertebral disc space could increase function and halt degeneration in this anatomical region. Great improvements have been achieved in developing better techniques and tools in spine surgery. It is envisaged that progress in the four focus areas discussed will lead to better outcomes and reduced burdens on the future of both our patients and the health care system.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionSpine, 2010
- Clinical Acceptance and Accuracy Assessment of Spinal Implants Guided With SpineAssist Surgical RobotSpine, 2010
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Osteogenic Protein-1 in Instrumented Posterolateral FusionsSpine, 2010
- Percutaneous Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Lumbar Spine Using a Bone Mounted Miniature Robotic SystemSpine, 2009
- The Safety and Efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a Replacement for Iliac Crest Autograft in Posterolateral Lumbar ArthrodesisSpine, 2008
- A NOVEL MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE FOR SPINAL CORD UNTETHERINGOperative Neurosurgery, 2007
- Clinical Results of ProDisc-II Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Report from the United States Clinical TrialOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2005
- Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral discJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2004
- Prospective Study Evaluating Total Disc ReplacementJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2003
- Subjective complaints in orthopedists and general surgeonsInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1995