An Investigation of the Effects of Drill Operator Posture on Vibration Exposure and Temporary Threshold Shift of Vibrotactile Perception Threshold
Open Access
Abstract
The present study involved performing an experiment to clarify whether vibration measurement values on the tool handle, in accordance with ISO 5349-1, can assess risk from workplace environments. The study investigated the relationship between the vibration magnitude of a hand-held electric drill with different operating postures. The experiment included the determination of the participant’s temporary threshold shift (TTS) of vibrotactile perception threshold (VPT) at the tip of the index finger. The experimental hypothesis was that the vibration measurement values on the tool handle, in accordance with the ISO 5349-1 standard, include the effect of posture on the vibration measurements obtained despite the variation in posture and test participants. The hand-transmitted vibration (HTV) was applied using a hand-held electric drill applied to a pre-cast concrete paving slab substrate (600 × 600 × 50 mm, 55 MPa) using a 10 mm diameter masonry drill bit (without hammer action). The tool was operated using the right hand on twelve male subjects with three working postures (n = 36). Vibration was measured in three orthogonal directions according to the international standard ISO 5349-1 procedure. Vibration magnitudes were expressed as root-mean-square (r.m.s.) acceleration, frequency-weighted using the frequency weighting. Clause 4.3 states that the characterisation of the vibration exposure is assessed from the acceleration of the surface in contact with the hand as the primary quantity. The experimental results indicate that the TTS following vibration exposure is not related to the measured vibration magnitude on the tool handle. Therefore, the automatic inclusion of posture and test participant variation is not proven. The results suggest that the vibration measurement values on the tool handle do not predict the TTS after hand-transmitted vibration in varying posture across the test participants. The research concludes that tool handle vibration measurement, in accordance with ISO 5349-1, does not properly assess the potential hazard from authentic workplace tool usage conditions of varying postures.
Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Proposal on Neurological Dose–Response Relationship for Inclusion in ISO 5349-1 Documentation to be Used in Tropical EnvironmentAcoustics Australia, 2016
- Hand-arm mechanical impedance in presence of unknown vibration directionInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2013
- Biomechanical models of the human hand-arm to simulate distributed biodynamic responses for different posturesInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2012
- Characterisation of the mechanical impedance of the human hand–arm system: The influence of vibration direction, hand–arm posture and muscle tensionInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2007
- Modeling of biodynamic responses distributed at the fingers and the palm of the human hand–arm systemJournal of Biomechanics, 2007
- Influence of hand–arm posture on biodynamic response of the human hand–arm exposed to zh-axis vibrationInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2006
- Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white fingerOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003
- Risk of hand‐arm vibration syndrome according to occupation and sources of exposure to hand‐transmitted vibration: A national surveyAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2001
- Hand-arm vibration syndrome and dose-response relation for vibration induced white finger among quarry drillers and stonecarvers. Italian Study Group on Physical Hazards in the Stone Industry.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1994
- Temporary threshold shifts in fingertip vibratory sensation from hand-transmitted vibration and repetitive shock.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1993