Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 45 (5) , 719-727
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal AdenocarcinomaJAMA Surgery, 2013
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomyHPB, 2012
- Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated With Significantly Less Overall Morbidity Compared to the Open TechniqueAnnals of Surgery, 2012
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studiesSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomiesSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2010
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approachSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Influence of Resection Margins and Treatment on Survival in Patients With Pancreatic CancerArchives of Surgery, 2008
- Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysisTrials, 2007