Using FRAM Visualisations in quality improvement projects: identifying and testing strategies to improve anticoagulant use in the perioperative process
Authors:
- Nienke M LuijcksNLNienke M Luijcks
- Annelies VisserAVAnnelies Visser
- Maarten J van der LaanMLMaarten J van der Laan
- FIAF study groupFGFIAF study group
Open Access
- 7 August 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Vol. 37 (3)
Abstract
Background: To improve healthcare processes, gaining a thorough understanding of the work is important. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) is a method that can be used for this purpose by visualising how different steps in a process interact. However, little research is available on the use and feasibility of FRAM in quality improvement studies. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of using FRAM visualisations in a quality improvement study, to identify, formulate and test improvement strategies regarding anticoagulant use in the perioperative process in two Dutch University Medical Centres. Methods: Through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, FRAM visualisations of Work-as-Imagined and Work-as-Done were created, which were validated and discussed with healthcare professionals through focus groups. Improvement suggestions were collected as input for improvement strategies from frontline clinicians. These strategies were tested and evaluated using questionnaires and interviews. The interviews were analysed using content analysis to further explore the value of the FRAM visualisations for identifying and employing improvement strategies. Results: The FRAM visualisations were perceived as confusing by professionals given their limited knowledge of FRAM, and it was time-intensive to identify possible improvements in the perioperative process. Using a simplified visualisation that showed the key FRAM information, resulted in multiple improvement suggestions which were successfully tested as improvement strategies. The content analysis revealed three themes related to the use of FRAM: how care could be organised efficiently and safely, bringing stakeholders together to highlight their roles and responsibilities of professionals, and identifying how documentation of patient information is often scattered or incomplete. Conclusions: FRAM visualisations in quality improvement studies can provide valuable insights into the working process, which was also useful for formulating and testing improvement strategies. However, adjustments to the visualisations are necessary to enable professionals to participate in identifying improvement strategies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Handing over to the patient’: A FRAM analysis of transitional care combining multiple stakeholder perspectivesApplied Ergonomics, 2020
- Optimization of home care nurses in Canada: A scoping reviewHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2019
- Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis MethodBMC Medicine, 2018
- Anticoagulant medication errors in hospitals and primary care: a cross-sectional studyInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2018
- Preoperative Anticoagulation Management in Everyday Clinical Practice: An International Comparative Analysis of Work-as-Done Using the Functional Resonance Analysis MethodJournal of Patient Safety, 2018
- A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2018
- The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviewsBMC Health Services Research, 2015
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing clinical care pathwaysBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- An overview of clinical governance policies, practices and initiativesAustralian Health Review, 2008
- Walter A Shewhart, 1924, and the Hawthorne factoryQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006