Evidence-Based Medicine and The Cochrane Collaboration
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 67 (2) , 198-205
Abstract
Providing evidence-based care to patients involves turning a clinical problem into an answerable question, systematically searching for the best evidence relevant to the question, critically appraising that evidence, and, finally, using the evidence as the basis for clinical decisions to solve the problem. While the overload of medical information today presents a demanding challenge to physicians to sort and identify relevant and valid evidence, it is vitally important to translate that evidence into clinically useful terms. To apply evidence to patient clinical management, it is critical to discuss with patients the evidence, the benefits and the harms, and the alternative treatments, such that they understand and can fully participate in the decision-making process. The framework of evidenced-based medicine provides a concrete methodology to address these issues, here, framed and detailed in five steps. The Cochrane Collaboration has been at the forefront of applying the methods of evidencebased medicine (EBM) in the treatment and management of musculoskeletal and other disorders.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Should the Impact of Different Presentations of Treatment Effects on Patient Choice Be Evaluated? A Pilot Randomized TrialPLOS ONE, 2008
- Point: Evidence-Based Medicine Has a Sound Scientific BaseChest, 2008
- A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Presenting Treatment Benefits in Different FormatsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approachBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informativeJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- The Effect of Numerical Statements of Risk on Trust and Comfort with Hypothetical Physician Risk CommunicationMedical Decision Making, 2004
- A comparison of three different sources of data in assessing the frequencies of adverse reactions to amiodaroneBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- The Relation between Systematic Reviews and Practice GuidelinesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Medical Practice Guidelines: Current Activities and Future DirectionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990