Atypical antipsychotics for people with both schizophrenia and depression
- 23 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2012 (1) , CD005377
Abstract
Background Many people (up to 50%) with schizophrenia also have co‐morbid depression. It has been suggested that new atypical antipsychotic drugs are beneficial for people with the two diagnoses. Objectives To assess the effects of atypical antipsychotic drugs on people who have a diagnosis of both schizophrenia and depression. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia's Group Register (to March 2006). We supplemented this by citation searching and personal contact with authors and relevant pharmaceutical companies. Selection criteria We included randomised clinical trials of atypical antipsychotic drugs used specifically for the treatment of people with a diagnosis of both schizophrenia and depression. Data collection and analysis We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention‐to‐treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). Main results We found 878 citations but were only able to include three studies (five reports). One trial found no significant difference between quetiapine and haloperidol for the outcome of 'less than 50% reduction in PANSS score' (n=180, RR 0.91 CI 0.8 to 1.0). Those allocated sulpiride had significantly lower depression scores compared with people given chlorpromazine (1 RCT, n=36, WMD CPRS ‐0.70 CI ‐1.2 to ‐0.2). Again, however, in the quetiapine versus haloperidol comparison, the continuous scoring did not highlight differences (1 RCT, n=180, WMD PANSS depression change ‐0.57 CI ‐1.4 to 0.30). When clozapine was compared with any other antipsychotic drug plus an antidepressant or placebo, clozapine constantly scored better on Hamilton scores (1 RCT, n=29, WMD vs antipsychotic + mianserin ‐5.53 CI ‐8.23 to ‐2.8; 1 RCT, n=32, WMD vs antipsychotic + meclobemide ‐4.35 CI ‐6.7 to ‐2.03; 1 RCT, n=33, WMD vs antipsychotic + placebo ‐6.35 CI ‐8.6 to ‐4.1). Authors' conclusions There are too few data to guide patients, carers, clinicians or policy makers. Current practice has to be guided by evidence other than that derived from randomised trials and more trials in this important area are indicated.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Differential effects of high-dose amisulpride versus flupentixol on latent dimensions of depressive and negative symptomatology in acute schizophrenia: an evaluation using confirmatory factor analysisInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2002
- Depressive symptoms among patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical antipsychoticsEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001
- Treatment of depressive symptoms in partially refractory schizophrenia: Efficacy of quetiapine versus haloperidolEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001
- Amisulpride improves depressive symptoms in acute exacerbations of schizophrenia: Comparison with haloperidol and risperidoneEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001
- Risperidone versus olanzapine for the treatment of mood symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorderEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001
- Latent dimensions of depressive and negative symptoms in acute schizophrenia: Treatment effects of high dose amisulpride vs. flupentixolEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 1998
- Depression in Schizophrenia: A Descriptive StudyAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960