Globalization, Scientific Lexicons, and the Future of Biology
Open Access
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal
- Vol. 11 (3) , 373-382
Abstract
For well over a century, temporality has played little more than a fleeting role in most of our biological sciences, and perhaps especially in genetics. For too long we have tried to build our understanding of genetic processes out of nouns, around entities. Perhaps it is time for a science constructed in and around the dynamics of biological processes, a genetics built not from nouns but from verbs. Perhaps the term gene itself can be revived for the twenty-first century by refiguring it as a verb. Would this be possible? Certainly our commitment to a noun-based science, to entity realism, runs deep, perhaps as deep as our understanding of science itself. Yet this article puts forward the suggestion that alternative linguistic traditions—rooted more in verbs than in nouns—might help us to develop a lexicon more suited to the dynamic interactivity of living systems to which current research in systems biology introduces us.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The century beyond the geneJournal of Biosciences, 2005
- Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections2004
- Culture and point of viewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Synthetic biology: Act naturalNature, 2003
- Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.Psychological Review, 2001
- Beyond Science and Civilization: A Post-Needham CritiqueEast Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine, 1999
- A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and MandarinCognition, 1998
- Gender and Science: Origin, History, and PoliticsOsiris, 1995
- Common Themes and Cultural Variations in Japanese and American Mothers' Speech to InfantsChild Development, 1993
- Demystifying Mentalities1990