Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
- 26 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 184 (8) , E424-E430
Abstract
Background: Guidelines for perinatal mental health care recommend the use of two case-finding questions about depressed feelings and loss of interest in activities, despite the absence of validation studies in this context. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of these questions and of a third question about the need for help asked of women receiving perinatal care. Methods: We evaluated self-reported responses to two case-finding questions against an interviewer-assessed diagnostic standard (DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder) among 152 women receiving antenatal care at 26–28 weeks’ gestation and postnatal care at 5–13 weeks after delivery. Among women who answered “yes” to either question, we assessed the usefulness of asking a third question about the need for help. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for the two case-finding questions and for the added question about the need for help. Results: Antenatally, the two case-finding questions had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77%–100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI 58%–76%), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.03 (95% CI 2.28–4.02) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.041 (95% CI 0.003–0.63) in identifying perinatal depression. Postnatal results were similar. Among the women who screened positive antenatally, the additional question about the need for help had a sensitivity of 58% (95% CI 38%–76%), a specificity of 91% (95% CI 78%–97%), a positive likelihood ratio of 6.86 (95% CI 2.16–21.7) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45 (95% CI 0.25–0.80), with lower sensitivity and higher specificity postnatally. Interpretation: Negative responses to both of the case-finding questions showed acceptable accuracy for ruling out perinatal depression. For positive responses, the use of a third question about the need for help improved specificity and the ability to rule in depression.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of two case finding questions to detect postnatal depression: A review of diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2011
- Postpartum Depression Screening at Well-Child Visits: Validity of a 2-Question Screen and the PHQ-9The Annals of Family Medicine, 2009
- Screening older people with musculoskeletal pain for depressive symptoms in primary careBritish Journal of General Practice, 2008
- Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: Protocol for the recruitment phaseBMC Public Health, 2008
- Should we screen for depression?BMJ, 2006
- Perinatal DepressionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Screening for Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease (Data from the Heart and Soul Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Prevalence of Depression During Pregnancy: Systematic ReviewObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- The impact of postpartum depression on child developmentInternational Review of Psychiatry, 1996
- Detection of Postnatal DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987