Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline for the Treatment of Genital Chlamydia Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Open Access
- 11 April 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 59 (2) , 193-205
Abstract
Background. There has been recent debate questioning the efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of 1 g azithromycin with 100 mg doxycycline twice daily (7 days) for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection. Methods. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane reviews, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched until 31 December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing azithromycin with doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia with evaluation of microbiological cure within 3 months of treatment were included. Sex, diagnostic test, follow-up time, attrition, patient symptomatic status, and microbiological cure were extracted. The primary outcome was the difference in efficacy at final follow-up. Study bias was quantitatively and qualitatively summarized. Results. Twenty-three studies were included evaluating 1147 and 912 patients for azithromycin and doxycycline, respectively. We found a pooled efficacy difference in favor of doxycycline of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], −.1% to 3.1%; I2 = 1.9%; P = .435; random effects) to 2.6% (95% CI, .5%–4.7%; fixed effects). Subgroup analyses showed that the fixed effects pooled efficacy difference for symptomatic men was 7.4% (95% CI, 2.0%–12.9%), and the random effects was 5.5% (95% CI, −1.4% to 12.4%). Conclusions. There may be a small increased efficacy of up to 3% for doxycycline compared with azithromycin for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia and about 7% increased efficacy for doxycycline for the treatment of symptomatic urethral infection in men. However, the quality of the evidence varies considerably, with few double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted. Given increasing concern about potential azithromycin failure, further well-designed and statistically powered double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium. Observations from a Swedish STD ClinicPLOS ONE, 2013
- Chlamydia trachomatis Test-of-Cure Cannot Be Based on a Single Highly Sensitive Laboratory Test Taken at Least 3 Weeks after TreatmentPLOS ONE, 2012
- Azithromycin antimicrobial resistance and genitalChlamydia trachomatisinfection: duration of therapy may be the key to improving efficacySexually Transmitted Infections, 2012
- Questioning Azithromycin for Chlamydial InfectionSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2011
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Re-Evaluating the Treatment of Nongonococcal Urethritis: Emphasizing Emerging Pathogens-A Randomized Clinical TrialClinical Infectious Diseases, 2010
- RepeatedChlamydia trachomatisGenital Infections in Adolescent WomenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16 24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory GroupSexually Transmitted Infections, 2007
- The case for further treatment studies of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infectionSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003