The impact of social influence on adolescent intention to smoke: Combining types and referents of influence
Authors:
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Health Psychology
- Vol. 14 (4) , 681-699
Abstract
Objectives Theory and research suggest that the intention to smoke is the main determinant of smoking initiation and emphasizes the role of cognitive and social factors on the prediction of the intention to smoke. However, extended models such as the I‐Change and results from published studies reveal inconsistencies regarding the impact of social influence on the intention to smoke. Possible explanations for this may be the definition and measurement of the constructs that have been used. Design and methods The current study was designed with two main goals: (i) to test a measurement model for social influence, combining different types of social influence (subjective norms, perceived behaviour, and direct pressure) with various referents of influence (parents, siblings, peers, and teachers); (ii) to investigate the impact of social influence on adolescent intention to smoke, controlling for smoking behaviour. LISREL was used to test these models. The sample includes 3,064 Portuguese adolescents, with a mean age of 13.5 years, at the beginning of the seventh school grade. Results The hypothesized measurement model of social influence was supported by results and explained 29% of the variance of the intention to smoke. A more extended model, including attitude and self‐efficacy, explained 55% of the variance of the intention to smoke. Perceived behaviour of peers, parental norms, and perceived behaviour of parents were the social influence factors with impact on adolescent intention to smoke. Conclusions Results suggest that different referents exert their influence through distinct types of social influence and recommend further work on the definition and measurement of social influence.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model: Predictive validity of actor versus abstainer prototypes for adolescents' health‐protective and health‐risk intentionsBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2006
- Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 2006
- Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The role of moral normBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2005
- Nine-year prospective association between older siblings’ smoking and children’s daily smokingJournal of Adolescent Health, 2003
- Why do Danish adolescents take up smoking?European Journal of Public Health, 2003
- Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Exercise Domain: A Comparison of Social Support and Subjective NormResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2002
- Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic reviewBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2001
- Parental attachment and adolescents' emotional adjustment: The associations with social skills and relational competence.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2001
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Smoking in children: Developing a social psychological strategy of deterrencePreventive Medicine, 1976