Therapist-guided and self-guided internet-delivered behavioural activation for adolescents with depression: a randomised feasibility trial
Open Access
Abstract
Objective Access to effective treatments for adolescents with depression needs to improve. Few studies have evaluated behavioural activation (BA) for adolescent depression, and none remotely delivered BA. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of therapist-guided and self-guided internet-delivered BA (I-BA) in preparation for a future randomised controlled trial (RCT). Design A single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial. Setting A specialist outpatient clinic in Sweden. Participants Thirty-two adolescents with mild-to-moderate major depression, aged 13–17 years. Interventions Ten weeks of therapist-guided I-BA or self-guided I-BA, or treatment as usual (TAU). Both versions of I-BA included parental support. TAU included referral to usual care within child and youth psychiatry or primary care. Outcomes Feasibility measures included study take-up, participant retention, acceptability, safety and satisfaction. The primary outcome measure was the blinded assessor-rated Children’s Depression Rating Scale, Revised. The primary endpoint was the 3-month follow-up. Results 154 adolescents were screened and 32 were randomised to therapist-guided I-BA (n=11), self-guided I-BA (n=10) or TAU (n=11). Participant retention was acceptable, with two drop-outs in TAU. Most participants in TAU had been offered interventions by the primary endpoint. The mean number of completed chapters (total of 8) for adolescents was 7.5 in therapist-guided I-BA and 5.4 in self-guided I-BA. No serious adverse events were recorded. Satisfaction was acceptable in both I-BA groups. Following an intent-to-treat approach, the linear mixed-effects model revealed that both therapist-guided and self-guided I-BA (Cohen’s d=2.43 and 2.23, respectively), but not TAU (Cohen’s d=0.95), showed statistically significant changes on the primary outcome measure with large within-group effect sizes. Conclusions Both therapist-guided and self-guided I-BA are acceptable and potentially efficacious treatments for adolescents with depression. It is feasible to conduct a large-scale RCT to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of I-BA versus TAU. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04117789).Keywords
Funding Information
- Stiftelsen Frimurare Barnhuset i Stockholm (2019 (no specific grant number))
- Kavli Foundation (4-3124, 2018)
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Affective Reactivity Index: a concise irritability scale for clinical and research settingsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2012
- The Costs of DepressionPsychiatric Clinics of North America, 2012
- Usual and Unusual CarePsychosomatic Medicine, 2011
- Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of lifeQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Reliability and Validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID)The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2010
- Prevalence and Treatment of Mental Disorders Among US Children in the 2001–2004 NHANESPediatrics, 2010
- Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis.Psychological Methods, 2009
- Handling drop‐out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approachesPharmaceutical Statistics, 2007
- A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996
- Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scaleEvaluation and Program Planning, 1979