Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production
- 8 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 108 (33) , 13864-13869
Abstract
Over 13 million ha of former cropland are enrolled in the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), providing well-recognized biodiversity, water quality, and carbon (C) sequestration benefits that could be lost on conversion back to agricultural production. Here we provide measurements of the greenhouse gas consequences of converting CRP land to continuous corn, corn–soybean, or perennial grass for biofuel production. No-till soybeans preceded the annual crops and created an initial carbon debt of 10.6 Mg CO 2 equivalents (CO 2 e)·ha −1 that included agronomic inputs, changes in C stocks, altered N 2 O and CH 4 fluxes, and foregone C sequestration less a fossil fuel offset credit. Total debt, which includes future debt created by additional changes in soil C stocks and the loss of substantial future soil C sequestration, can be constrained to 68 Mg CO 2 e·ha −1 if subsequent crops are under permanent no-till management. If tilled, however, total debt triples to 222 Mg CO 2 e·ha −1 on account of further soil C loss. Projected C debt repayment periods under no-till management range from 29 to 40 y for corn–soybean and continuous corn, respectively. Under conventional tillage repayment periods are three times longer, from 89 to 123 y, respectively. Alternatively, the direct use of existing CRP grasslands for cellulosic feedstock production would avoid C debt entirely and provide modest climate change mitigation immediately. Incentives for permanent no till and especially permission to harvest CRP biomass for cellulosic biofuel would help to blunt the climate impact of future CRP conversion.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment TrilemmaScience, 2009
- Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasolineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of MiscanthusGlobal Change Biology, 2008
- Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon DebtScience, 2008
- Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use ChangeScience, 2008
- Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulationJournal of Ecology, 2008
- Considering the influence of sequestration duration and carbon saturation on estimates of soil carbon capacityClimatic Change, 2006
- Do Productivity and Environmental Trade‐offs Justify Periodically Cultivating No‐till Cropping Systems?Agronomy Journal, 2006
- Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental GoalsScience, 2006
- Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: Bioethanol and biodieselBiomass and Bioenergy, 2005