Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: New findings and new challenges for computational models.
Authors:
- Michael G. ReynoldsMRMichael G. Reynolds
- Derek BesnerDBDerek Besner
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Vol. 32 (4) , 799-810
Abstract
A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.Keywords
Funding Information
- Università degli Studi di Trento (A0998)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (A0998)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neighbourhood Density, Word Frequency, and Spelling-Sound Regularity Effects in Naming: Similarities and Differences Between Skilled Readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational Model.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2004
- A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy".Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2003
- Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: New insights from simulations with the DRC model.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2002
- How to Deal with “The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy”: Common Misconceptions and Alternative SolutionsJournal of Memory and Language, 1999
- Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.Psychological Review, 1999
- Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other VariablesThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1997
- Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989
- Learning representations by back-propagating errorsNature, 1986
- An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review, 1982
- Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 wordsBehavior Research Methods, 1980