The Effect of Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis on Reoperation Rates After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Review of a Large Private‐Payer Database From 2007 to 2014
- 20 March 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy
- Vol. 33 (7) , 1301-1307.e1
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if reoperation rates are higher for patients who underwent isolated rotator cuff repair (RCR) than those who underwent RCR with concomitant biceps tenodesis using a large private‐payer database. Methods: A national insurance database was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between the years 2007 and 2014 (PearlDiver, Warsaw, IN). The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 29,827 (arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with RCR) identified RCR patients who were subdivided into 3 groups—group 1: RCR without biceps tenodesis; group 2: RCR with concomitant arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (CPT 29827 and 29,828); group 3: RCR with concomitant open biceps tenodesis (CPT 29827 and 23,430). Reoperation rates (revision RCR, subsequent biceps surgeries) and complications at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare reoperations and complications between groups. Rotator cuff tear size, whether the biceps was ruptured and whether a biceps tenotomy was performed, was not available. Results: Group 1: 27,178 patients. Group 2: 4,810 patients. Group 3: 1,493 patients. More patients underwent concomitant arthroscopic than concomitant open tenodesis ( P < .001). A total of 2,509 patients underwent a reoperation for RCR or biceps tenodesis within 1 year after RCR. When adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities, no significant differences in reoperation rates at 30 days or 90 days among the 3 groups, but significantly more patients who had a tenodesis, required a reoperation compared with those who did not have a tenodesis at 6 months and 1 year (both P < .001). Urinary tract infections were more common in patients who did not have a tenodesis, whereas dislocation, nerve injury, and surgical site infection were more common in tenodesis patients. Conclusions: Higher reoperation rates at 1 year were seen in patients who had concomitant biceps tenodesis. Level of Evidence: Level III, case‐control database review study.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgery within 6 months of an acute rotator cuff tear significantly improves outcomeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015
- Arthroscopic Repair for Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic ReviewArthroscopy, 2015
- Increasing incidence of rotator cuff repairs—A nationwide registry study in FinlandBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2015
- Retear Rates After Arthroscopic Single‐Row, Double‐Row, and Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair at a Minimum of 1 Year of Imaging Follow‐up: A Systematic ReviewArthroscopy, 2015
- All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps BrachiiThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015
- Anatomy of the Biceps Tendon: Implications for Restoring Physiological Length‐Tension Relation During Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw FixationArthroscopy, 2012
- The long head of biceps as a source of pain in active population: tenotomy or tenodesis? A comparison of 2 case series with isolated lesionsMUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2012
- National Trends in Rotator Cuff RepairJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2012
- Disorder of the long head of the biceps tendonBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- The Proximal Biceps as a Pain Generator and Results of TenotomySports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 2008