Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
Open Access
- 22 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Neurochirurgica
- Vol. 163 (6) , 1623-1634
Abstract
Objective: Common surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous procedures (glycerol rhizolysis; thermocoagulation; and balloon compression). Although the efficacy of each procedure has been documented, direct comparisons of their relative efficacies for TN are lacking. We aimed to directly compare long-term outcomes after first-time MVD with percutaneous surgery in primary (idiopathic and classical) TN and identify predictors of outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 185 patients undergoing MVD and 129 undergoing percutaneous surgery. Procedures were performed by one of two neurosurgeons in a single centre; an independent observer collected long-term follow-up data by interviews, using the same outcome measures for all procedures. Results: MVD patients were younger than those undergoing percutaneous surgery (P <.001). MVD provided superior initial pain relief (P <.001): 87.0% had Barrow Neurological Institute class I or II pain scores after MVD compared with 67.2% after percutaneous surgery. The complication rate for percutaneous procedures was 35.7% and for MVDs was 24.9% (P =.04), including minor and transient complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that MVD provided longer pain relief than percutaneous procedures (P <.001); 25% of patients had recurrence at 96 months following MVD compared with 12 months after percutaneous surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that balloon compression provided more durable relief amongst percutaneous procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that post-operative numbness and age were prognostic factors for percutaneous procedures (P =.03 and .01, respectively). Conclusions: MVD provides better initial pain relief and longer durability of relief than percutaneous surgery, although carrying a small risk of major complications. Amongst percutaneous procedures, balloon compression gave the most durable relief from pain. Older age and post-operative numbness were predictors of good outcome from percutaneous surgery. These results can help clinicians to counsel patients with primary TN on neurosurgical treatment selection for pain relief.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors That Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Balloon Compression in the Treatment of Trigeminal NeuralgiaNeurosurgery, 2010
- Prospective Comparison of Posterior Fossa Exploration and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dorsal Root Entry Zone Target as Primary Surgery for Patients With Idiopathic Trigeminal NeuralgiaNeurosurgery, 2010
- The predictive power of balloon shape and change of sensory functions on outcome of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgiaJournal of Neurosurgery, 2010
- Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and glycerol rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgiaJournal of Neurosurgery, 2010
- Long-term Results of 405 Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia Surgeries in 256 PatientsCentral European Neurosurgery, 2008
- Perioperative and long-term operative outcomes after surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: microvascular decompression vs percutaneous balloon ablationHead & Face Medicine, 2008
- Various surgical modalities for trigeminal neuralgia: literature study of respective long-term outcomesActa Neurochirurgica, 2008
- Are the destructive neurosurgical techniques as effective as microvascular decompression in the management of trigeminal neuralgia?Surgical Neurology, 2007
- Current algorithm for the surgical treatment of facial painHead & Face Medicine, 2007
- A 20-year review of percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglionJournal of Neurosurgery, 2001