News Frames Terrorism: A Comparative Analysis of Frames Employed in Terrorism Coverage in U.S. and U.K. Newspapers
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in The International Journal of Press/Politics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 52-74
Abstract
Scholars have been increasingly concerned with portrayals of terrorism in mainstream and alternative media outlets following the September 11 and subsequent terrorist attacks in the United Kingdom and Spain. Communication researchers have examined public response and reaction to terrorist attacks, definitions of terrorism, policy questions, media portrayals of terrorism, and framing across different media and nations. This study undertakes a comparative framing analysis of media coverage of terrorism, as reported by prominent U.S. and U.K. newspapers, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings revealed that the U.S. papers engaged in more episodic coverage and the U.K. papers in more thematic coverage of terrorism and terrorism-related events. The U.S. papers were consumed with presenting news associated with the military approach, whereas the U.K. papers were oriented toward diplomatic evaluations of terrorist events.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Media Coverage of Acts of Terrorism: Troubling Episodes and Suggested GuidelinesCanadian Journal of Communication, 2005
- Framing Terrorism2004
- Framing Public Life2001
- Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text2000
- News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media CynicismThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996
- Bad News, Bad GovernanceThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996
- Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured ParadigmJournal of Communication, 1993
- Is Anyone Responsible?1991
- Terrorism and the news mediaTerrorism and Political Violence, 1990
- Terrorists or freedom fighters? Labeling terrorism in the Israeli pressPolitical Communication, 1985