IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS?
Authors:
- José Celso ArdenghJAJosé Celso Ardengh
- Vitor Ottoboni BrunaldiVBVitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Mariângela Ottoboni BrunaldiMBMariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Alberto Facuri GasparAGAlberto Facuri Gaspar
- Jorge Resende Lopes-JúniorJLJorge Resende Lopes-Júnior
- Ajith Kumar SankarankuttyASAjith Kumar Sankarankutty
- Rafael KempRKRafael Kemp
- José Sebastião dos SantosJSJosé Sebastião dos Santos
Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
- Vol. 33 (4) , e1554
Abstract
Background: It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. Aim: To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy. Methods: This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist. Results: The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51±1.3 mm vs. 0.94±0.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively. Conclusions: The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesionsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2013
- A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic massesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2013
- Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25‐gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologistDigestive Endoscopy, 2012
- Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy using 22-gauge needle in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitisDigestive and Liver Disease, 2011
- HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS BY EUS‐GUIDED FINE‐NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY IN PANCREATIC SOLID MASSES WITHOUT ON‐SITE CYTOPATHOLOGIST: A SINGLE‐CENTER EXPERIENCEDigestive Endoscopy, 2011
- False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factorsGut, 2010
- EUS-FNA Without the Stylet: The Yield Is Comparable to That with the Stylet and Sampling of Multiple Sites During the Same Pass May Improve Sample Quality and YieldGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologistsJournal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: Performance and outcomesJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancerJournal of Gastroenterology, 2005