Prospective pedagogy for teaching chemical bonding for smart and sustainable learning
- 16 June 2014
- journal article
- perspective
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Chemistry Education Research and Practice
- Vol. 15 (4) , 435-446
Abstract
As an important subject in the curriculum, many students find chemistry concepts difficult to learn and understand. Chemical bonding especially is important in understanding the compositions of chemical compounds and related concepts and research has shown that students struggle with this concept. In this theoretical paper based on analysis of relevant science education research, textbooks, and our classroom observations and teaching experiences, the authors argue that the difficulty in learning chemical bonding concepts is associated with the sequence (ionic, covalent and polar covalent bonding) in which students are taught because this sequence receives little support from constructivist theories of learning. Consequently, the paper proposes a sequence to teach chemical bonding (covalent, polar covalent and ionic bonding) for effective and sustainable learning. In this sequence, the concepts are developed with minimum reorganisation of previously learned information, using a format which is claimed to be easy for students to learn. For teaching these concepts, the use of electronegativity and the overlap of atomic orbitals for all types of bonding have also been stressed. The proposed sequence and emphasis on electronegativity and atomic orbital overlap meets the criteria for teaching and learning of concepts based on the psychology of learning including the theory of constructivism necessitating the construction of new knowledge using related prior knowledge. It also provides a better linkage between the bonding concepts learned at secondary and tertiary levels. Considering these proposed advantages for teaching, this sequence is recommended for further research into effective and sustainable teaching.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Trouble with Chemical Energy: Why Understanding Bond Energies Requires an Interdisciplinary Systems ApproachCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2013
- What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memoryCognition, 2012
- How We Teach Molecular Structure to FreshmenJournal of Chemical Education, 2002
- Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellersInternational Journal of Science Education, 2002
- BUILDING THE STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS OF CHEMISTRY: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FROM EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHChemistry Education Research and Practice, 2001
- Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structureInternational Journal of Science Education, 2000
- THE STATES-OF-MATTER APPROACH (SOMA) TO INTRODUCTORY CHEMISTRYChemistry Education Research and Practice, 2000
- Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the FutureJournal of Chemical Education, 1999
- A flow‐map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents' narrative using science contentJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Why changing the curriculum may not be enoughJournal of Chemical Education, 1992