Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Cardiology
- Vol. 5 (6) , 703-708
Abstract
In October 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) changed its donor heart allocation system in an effort to reduce mortality among patients on a waiting list.1 Patients treated with temporary, nondischargeable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) had the highest waitlist mortality and thus received the highest priority under the new system. Specifically, UNOS status 1 now includes patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or surgically implanted, nondischargeable MCS devices, and UNOS status 2 includes support with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous MCS devices (eg, microaxial intracardiac ventricular assist device). Patients supported only with inotropes are assigned a lower status (eTable 1 in the Supplement).Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockJAMA, 2020
- The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory SupportCirculation, 2020
- An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United StatesThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2020
- Comparison of the Hemodynamic Response to Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Resulting from Acute Myocardial Infarction Versus Acute Decompensated Heart FailureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2019
- Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) RegistryCirculation: Heart Failure, 2019
- Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care UnitsJAMA Cardiology, 2019
- Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care UnitsCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2019
- Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2019
- Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: Transformation of the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit and the Emerging Need for New Medical Staffing and Training ModelsCirculation, 2012