Rabbit Fungal Keratitis Model ofFusarium solaniTested Against Three Commercially Available Antifungal Drugs

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a reproducible preclinicalFusarium solanikeratitis model, which would allow comparative testing of currently available antifungals (NATACYN [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX], voriconazole 1%, and amphotericin B 0.1%) as well as efficacy testing of new antifungals for translation into clinical practice in the future. Methods: The rabbitF. solanikeratitis model was developed in New Zealand white rabbits using local and systemic immunosuppression. Infection was introduced by intrastromal injection ofF. solanispores into one of the immunosuppressed rabbit eyes while the contralateral eye was a control. Progress of the infection was assessed by the clinical features, histopathology, and viable fungal counts. In this study, the efficacy of currently available antifungals (NATACYN [Alcon], voriconazole 1%, and amphotericin B 0.1%) was compared. Rabbits were randomly divided (n=4 in each group), and the respective antifungal was instilled topically 5 times/day for 7 days. Treatment effects were analyzed by evaluating the anterior segment with the help of slit-lamp, histopathological findings and viable fungal culture at the end of the experiment. Results: We report the development of a reproducible and progressive rabbitF. solanikeratitis model as shown by the substantial viable fungal counts (3 log CFU), the presence of large patchy lesions and substantial hypopyon in the 12-day model correlated with specific histopathological analysis for fungus (extendedF. solanihyphae from midcorneal stroma into the anterior chamber and traverse Descemet membrane with anterior chamber suppurative plaque). Voriconazole 1% and NATACYN revealed significant reduction of the fungal wound area (P=0.02 and 0.021), respectively, while amphotericin B 0.1% exhibitedPvalue of 0.083 compared with their infected nontreated controls. Voriconazole 1% and amphotericin B 0.1% showed significant viable fungal count differences (P=0.004 and 0.01), respectively, whereasPvalue of NATACYN was 0.337 compared with control infected corneas. Conclusion: The reported rabbit fungal keratitis model can be used for screening new antifungals and evaluating currently available antifungals to facilitate better clinical outcomes. Voriconazole 1% showed the best efficacy among the three tested currently available antifungals by showing the significant differences in both wound size and viable fungal count comparisons in ourF. solanirabbit keratitis model.

This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit: