On the Rényi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Model
Authors:
Open Access
- 12 November 2021
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2321-2341
Abstract
The central question studied in this paper is Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) guarantees for general discrete local randomizers in the shuffle privacy model. In the shuffle model, each of the n clients randomizes its response using a local differentially private (LDP) mechanism and the untrusted server only receives a random permutation (shuffle) of the client responses without association to each client. The principal result in this paper is the first direct RDP bounds for general discrete local randomization in the shuffle privacy model, and we develop new analysis techniques for deriving our results which could be of independent interest. In applications, such an RDP guarantee is most useful when we use it for composing several private interactions. We numerically demonstrate that, for important regimes, with composition our bound yields an improvement in privacy guarantee by a factor of $8\times$ over the state-of-the-art approximate Differential Privacy (DP) guarantee (with standard composition) for shuffle models. Moreover, combining with Poisson subsampling, our result leads to at least $10\times$ improvement over subsampled approximate DP with standard composition.
Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- This work was also supported in part through the Google Faculty Research Award.
- This work was partially funded by NSF grants #1740047 #2007714 and and UC-NL grant LFR-18-548554.
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prochlo2017
- Rényi Differential Privacy2017
- Deep Learning with Differential Privacy2016
- Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Bounds2016
- RAPPOR2014
- Rényi Divergence and Kullback-Leibler DivergenceIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2014
- Local Privacy and Statistical Minimax Rates2013
- On sampling, anonymization, and differential privacy or, k -anonymization meets differential privacy2012
- What Can We Learn Privately?SIAM Journal on Computing, 2011
- Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer BiasJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1965