Flow‐based basophil activation test in immediate drug hypersensitivity. An EAACI task force position paper
Authors:
- C. MayorgaCMC. Mayorga
- G. E. ÇelikGÇG. E. Çelik
- M. PascalMPM. Pascal
- H. J. HoffmannHHH. J. Hoffmann
- B. EberleinBEB. Eberlein
- M. J. TorresMTM. J. Torres
- K. BrockowKBK. Brockow
- L. H. GarveyLGL. H. Garvey
- A. BarbaudABA. Barbaud
- R. Madrigal‐BurgaletaRMR. Madrigal‐Burgaleta
- J. C. CaubetJCJ. C. Caubet
- D. G. EboDED. G. Ebo
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Abstract
Diagnosing immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) can pose a significant challenge and there is an urgent need for safe and reliable tests. Evidence has emerged that the basophil activation test (BAT), an in vitro assay that mirrors the in vivo response, can be a complementary test for many drugs. In this position paper, members of Task Force (TF) “Basophil activation test in the evaluation of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions” from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) present the data from a survey about the use and utility of BAT in IDHRs in Europe. The survey results indicate that there is a great interest for using BAT especially for diagnosing IDHRs. However, there are still main needs, mainly in the standardization of the protocols. Subsequently consensus‐based recommendations were formulated for: (i) Technical aspects of BAT in IDHRs including type of sample, management of drugs, flow cytometry protocols, interpretation of the results; and (ii) Drug‐specific aspects that should be taken into account when performing BAT in relation to betalactams, neuromuscular blocking agents, fluoroquinolones, chlorhexidine, opioids, radio contrast media, chemotherapeutics, biological agents, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, COVID vaccine, and excipients. Moreover, aspects in the evaluation of pediatric population have also been considered. All this indicates that BAT offers the clinician and laboratory a complementary tool for a safe diagnostic for IDHRs, although its place in the diagnostic algorithm depends on the drug class and patient population (phenotype, geography, and age). The standardization of BAT is important for generalizing this method beyond the individual laboratory.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
This publication has 124 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to radiocontrast mediaAllergy, 2013
- IgE‐mediated allergy to pholcodine and cross‐reactivity to neuromuscular blocking agents: Lessons from flow cytometryCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2013
- Is a positive history of non‐anaesthetic drug allergy a predictive factor for positive allergy tests to anaesthetics?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012
- The diagnostic value of basophil activation test in patients with an immediate hypersensitivity reaction to radiocontrast mediaAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2011
- Ubiquitination and endocytosis of the high affinity receptor for IgEMolecular Immunology, 2010
- Effect of in vitro aspirin stimulation on basophils in patients with aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory diseaseClinical & Experimental Allergy, 2009
- Anaphylaxis to amidotrizoate proved by skin testing and flow cytometry‐based basophil activation testAllergy, 2009
- Endosomal trafficking of the ligated FcɛRI receptorMolecular Immunology, 2009
- The Basophil-Specific Ectoenzyme E-NPP3 (CD203c) as a Marker for Cell Activation and Allergy DiagnosisInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 2004
- General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivityAllergy, 2002